Loading page...
Loading page...
This round is closed. Synced from the EU Funding & Tenders Portal on 9 November 2026.
Projects the EU funded under this call, with the organisation that led each one.
EPIIC2Enhanced Pilot Interfaces & Interactions for fighter Cockpit Phase 2
Led by Thales Avs France SAS · France · 2026 · Official record ↗
Based on projects the EU funded on the same subject in this programme.
EPIICEnhanced Pilot Interfaces & Interactions for fighter Cockpit
EDF-2021-AIR-D-EPE-2 · 2022 · Official record ↗
NEUROQUADDisruptive “NEURO-QUantum-AI technology symbiosis” for Real-Time Cognitive Monitoring and Decision Support to improve Pilot Control and Safety.
EDF-2024-LS-RA-DIS-NT · 2026 · Official record ↗
Each one links to its EU funding record and the partners it works with: a starting list for building a consortium.
Expected Impact:The outcome should contribute to:
Objective:Future warfare is likely to be largely characterised by the networking of combat systems, including unmanned autonomous assets, and a high degree of automation of many systems. As a result, a large number of actors, sensors and effectors may be connected, generating an astonishing collection of information and data.
The challenge is therefore to provide the pilot with the appropriate situational awareness, understanding of system modes and status, and the ability to act and react in a timely manner to ensure mission success.
This requires the development of new equipment and associated software that can take advantage of new technologies such as wearables, optics, haptics, voice command, virtual operator assistants, augmented reality, and 3D holography.
Based on appropriate implementation concepts, this would free crew members from repetitive tasks, allowing them to focus their resources on high-value areas of action, and also support in mission execution, thereby improving combat effectiveness.
Specific objective
From the point of view of the human-machine relationship, the new generation of military aircraft involved in this collaborative air combat is likely to require a new generation of human-machine relationship that allows ergonomic cooperation between the crew and the machine, effective and safe flight, as well as cooperation with other assets, including unmanned ones. The new technologies would make it possible to gain a tactical advantage by assisting the crew as a real teammate, responding to requests, suggesting tactics and procedures, and adapting interfaces to the pilots' and/or operators' status and needs.
The definition of a novel design and interaction principles for managing automated and autonomous aircraft cooperating with System-of-Systems (SoS) teammates, including adaptive interfaces can be defined as Human-Machine Teaming (HMT).
Taking into account the new paradigm of human-machine teaming in future collaborative and connected air warfare, this call topic aims to address the following areas:
Preliminary analyses show that, in order to meet these challenges, future European air combat systems must be equipped with an innovative cockpit offering the pilot groundbreaking display and interaction capabilities. In this context, it seems clear that new products (e.g., head-down, eyes-out, interface modalities, virtual assistant) have to be developed.
Scope:With a view to contributing to the development of new generations of air combat and training aircraft and systems in the EU, including existing manned and unmanned air platforms, or to upgrading those currently in service, the proposals must:
Proposals must therefore address the following four areas:
Types of activities
The following types of activities are eligible for this topic:
Types of activities
(art 10(3) EDF Regulation)
Eligible?
(a)
Activities that aim to create, underpin and improve knowledge, products and technologies, including disruptive technologies, which can achieve significant effects in the area of defence (generating knowledge)
No
(b)
Activities that aim to increase interoperability and resilience, including secured production and exchange of data, to master critical defence technologies, to strengthen the security of supply or to enable the effective exploitation of results for defence products and technologies (integrating knowledge)
Yes
(optional)
(c)
Studies, such as feasibility studies to explore the feasibility of new or upgraded products, technologies, processes, services and solutions
Yes
(mandatory)
(d)
Design of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology as well as the definition of the technical specifications on which such design has been developed, including partial tests for risk reduction in an industrial or representative environment
Yes
(mandatory)
(e)
System prototyping of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology
Yes
(mandatory)
(f)
Testing of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology
Yes
(optional)
(g)
Qualification of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology
Yes
(optional)
(h)
Certification of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology
Yes
(optional)
(i)
Development of technologies or assets increasing efficiency across the life cycle of defence products and technologies
Yes
(optional)
Accordingly, the proposals must cover at least the following tasks as part of mandatory activities:
In addition, the proposals may:
The proposals must substantiate synergies and complementarity with foreseen, ongoing or completed activities in the field of air combat, notably those described in the call topic EDF-2021-AIR-D-EPE related to Enhanced pilot environment.
Functional requirements
The proposals should fulfil the following requirements:
(1) in order to support the future air collaborative combat:
(2) in order to improve human-machine performances:
(3) Specific technical requirements:
1. Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layout
described in section 5 of the call document. (available shortly)
Proposal page limits and layout: described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System.
2. Eligible Countries
described in section 6 of the call document.
3. Other Eligible Conditions
described in section 6 of the call document.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion
described in section 7 of the call document.
5a. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes
described section 8 of the call document and the Online Manual.
5b. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds
described in section 9 of the call document.
5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement
described in section 4 of the call document.
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants
described in section 10 of the call document.
Call document and annexes:
Call document
Application form templates
Standard application form (EDF) — the application form specific to this call is available in the Submission System
Detailed budget table (EDF DA)
Participant information (EDF)
List of infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources (EDF)
Cofinancing declaration (EDF DA, DA LS AND ASAP)
Actual indirect cost methodology declaration (EDF)
Harmonised capability declaration (EDF DA AND DA LS) 
Declaration on procurement intent and common specifications (EDF DA AND DA LS) 
Ownership control declaration 
PRS declaration (EDF) 
Model Grant Agreements (MGA)
EDF, ASAP and EDIRPA MGA 
Additional documents:
EDF Annual Work Programme
EDF Regulation 2021/697
EDF Programme Security Instruction (PSI)
EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment 
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement 
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual 
Funding & Tenders Portal Terms and Conditions 
Funding & Tenders Portal Privacy Statement
Applicants asked the EU 5 questions about this call and the EU published the answers. They clarify the call documents but do not replace them.
As a general principle, it is required that applicants use only the templates provided on the Funding & Tenders Portal. These templates have been designed in order to capture the information necessary to assess the eligibility of the proposal.
For development actions, as a derogation to this general principle, applicants may replace the following specific templates ‘harmonised capability declaration’ or ‘declaration on procurement intent and common specification’, with alternative forms such as a Letter of Intent (LoI) or a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), if deemed more appropriate. From an evaluation standpoint, no difference will be made between the available templates and the alternative forms as long as they contain the same level of detail and information and are signed by the competent authorities.
For research actions, none of these above-mentioned templates are mandatory (not part of the eligibility nor the award criteria).
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 13 Sept 2025
In the “Tpl_Detailed Budget Table” under EDF-2025, when filling in the ‘Purchases’ section of the resource sheet(s) and running “Update content”, only the first line of the “travel and subsistence” is transferred to the Summary and Summary per Activity worksheets, while the added lines and the costs from ‘Equipment’ and ‘Other goods, works and services’ are ignored. What should I do?
Due to a technical issue, for cost category: “C.1Travel and subsistence” in the ‘resource’ sheets, please use only one row and do not use the function/button additional row. Adjust the number of trips, the costs and the description accordingly.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 10 Oct 2025
The provision at submission stage of the Procurement intent/common technical specifications declaration and of the Harmonised capability requirements declaration is mandatory if and only if:
-For the requirement of “Procurement intent” and common technical specifications: it pertains to a development action covering prototyping, testing, qualification and/or certification
-For Harmonised capability requirements: it pertains to a development action covering design
However, the template for these declarations is not mandatory: it means that another template than the one provided by the Commission can be used (e.g. template from Member States like a Letter of Intent) under the condition that it contains the same information and the same level of details as the one requested in the Commission templates.
The Harmonised capability declaration confirms that the project proposal is based on Harmonised defence capability requirements jointly agreed by at least 2 Member States/Norway.
When it comes to the provision of the common technical specifications or the harmonised capability requirements mentioned in those declarations, you have the possibility either to provide them 1) at submission stage or 2) to provide them later during the action subject to the following conditions:
-Common technical specifications: if your development action also covers design, as a deliverable resulting from the design activity, before starting the prototyping, testing, qualification or certification activities
-Harmonised capability requirements: if your development action also covers studies, as a deliverable resulting from the studies activity, before the starting the design activity
We would suggest you get in touch with your National EDF Focal Point to guide you to the relevant national authority: defence-industry-space.ec.europa.eu
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 27 Feb 2026
The proposal must be drafted following the EDF call conditions. In addition, the proposal must respond to the mandatory activities of the topic EDF-2025-DA-ENERENV-APEM: Aircraft propulsion and energy management systems.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 10 Jun 2025
Due to a clerical error an older version of the Ownership and Control Declaration template was available in some EDF 2025 topics. However, there is no significant difference between the different versions for EDF, so both versions can be used.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 11 Sept 2025
Confirm the current call documents and submission conditions with the funding authority.
View on EU portal ↗Source: EU Funding & Tenders Portal · synced 2026-11-09
A free account keeps your shortlist and sends deadline reminders. The EUACC connector brings this call, its FAQs, past winners and similar calls into Claude or ChatGPT, so you can check fit and draft with sources.