Loading page...
Loading page...
This round is closed. Synced from the EU Funding & Tenders Portal on 9 November 2026.
Projects the EU funded under this call, with the organisation that led each one.
ACHILE 2Augmented Capability for HIgh end soLdiErs 2
Led by Safran Electronics & Defense · France · 2027 · Official record ↗
Based on projects the EU funded on the same subject in this programme.
ACHILEAugmented Capability for High End Soldiers
EDF-2021-PROTMOB-D-SS-2 · 2022 · Official record ↗
Each one links to its EU funding record and the partners it works with: a starting list for building a consortium.
Expected Impact:The outcome should contribute to:
Expected Outcome:As it is related to EUDIS, and in addition to the development activities, this call topic aims to support innovation opportunities and enable small companies to receive acceleration support and demonstrate innovative technologies relevant to soldier systems. To achieve this objective, financial support to third parties (FSTP, i.e., cascade funding) is included as part of the grant. This should increase the opportunities for various smaller actors, including those not previously active in the defence sector, to adapt innovative technologies for soldier systems, which include a significant number of small elements such as for ballistic protection, load carrying systems, textiles/clothing, including smart textiles, requirement for light batteries, electronic equipment (e.g., for communication, situational awareness, GPS, various sensors, etc.), and to identify potential business opportunities in the defence sector.
Objective:This call topic aims to develop the next-generation dismounted soldier system (NGDSS), finding synergies with existing topical EDF projects’ concepts and developments through an updated open-source architecture, as well as NATO efforts and the development of individual and networking capabilities.
It is therefore to continue the development of a demonstrator and the underlying concepts, by increasing the technical maturity for the capability suites to enable evaluation under representative conditions, and to demonstrate a new level of innovative technologies and the capability to address new threats, in the perspective of the NGDSS.
This should enable the EDTIB to design and promote a common, open and an innovative standard essential to the development of new equipment and subsystems for an interoperable solution.
Dismounted combat is highly exposed to high intensity operations. Recent conflicts around the world show that improving the soldier's proximal defence is essential to maintaining a good numerical ratio on the battlefield. The roboticisation of the battlefield is a clear opportunity, but also a constant threat to which a dismounted combat platoon must constantly adapt.
The challenge for soldier systems is to improve the effectiveness, resilience, and survivability of the soldiers on the battlefield. It should be designed for an easy integration of soldiers in the digital battlefield, through interoperability features, allowing them to quickly access available information and to receive protection against new threats (e.g., swarms, loitering munitions), while reducing the total burden on the soldier (i.e., including physical load and cognitive load).
The development of the NGDSS aims to meet this objective by finding synergies with emerging concepts and developments, through an updated open-source architecture and individual and networked capabilities.
Specific objective
The objective of this call topic is to enable the EDTIB to design and promote an innovative and open standard essential for the development of new equipment and subsystems for an interoperable and sovereign solution for a NGDSS.
Taking into account the lessons identified from recent conflicts, this call topic aims at addressing solutions in response to new threats, in particular those based on quickly adoptable civil technologies. These solutions should be applicable to urban and densely populated environments in temperate, cold, and hot climates. Certain individual solutions can be combined to achieve a collective effect at the platoon level.
The main specific challenge is to increase the maturity of the different building blocks required in terms of survivability, sustainability, mobility, energy, observation, and lethality, and to improve the ergonomic integration and system reliability at the soldier system level.
Another challenge is to further explore and demonstrate the benefits of emerging technologies, in particular to protect soldiers against growing and evolving threats in a high-intensity warfare environment. Therefore, the consortium is requested to reach out to third parties across the EU, EDF associated countries and Ukraine, in particular SMEs, including start-ups, to test a broad spectrum of technological solutions and give those innovative players the opportunity to demonstrate the potential of their ideas to relevant players in the defence application field. As a tool to enable this open innovation approach, funding for financial support to third parties (FSTP) is an integral part of the awarded grant. The consortium is required to organise calls to third parties to select and award start-ups and SMEs.
The selected third parties should be offered the opportunity and financial support to test their solutions, receive technical mentoring and other relevant acceleration services for a specific period. This should support the creation of a cross-border defence innovation network that encompasses players that would otherwise not have the means to access EDF actions, thereby further enhancing innovation capacity and competitiveness of the EDTIB.
The consortia responding to the call may include a large variety of entities, such as military or civil test centres, research institutes, universities, industry, certification authorities, accelerators, or incubators as well as other organisations that can play an important role to contribute for the benefit of the proposal.
Scope:With a view to a NGDSS capable of facing new types of threats, the proposals must further develop the concepts and open architecture for soldier systems with leading edge innovative technologies, by increasing the technical maturity of the capability suites to enable evaluation under representative conditions, including prototyping and testing of relevant soldier capability suites and devices.
The proposals must therefore address:
The proposals must describe how entities with expertise on the relevant technologies know-how should be supported, including the proposed implementation conditions for FSTP. Recipients of FSTP that contribute to the technology development must receive financial support to prepare a sample of their technology, to attend and support the testing of their technological sample, and to technologically improve their solution.
FSTP may also be provided to entities that contribute with analysis and measurement capacities, technology-specific expertise, innovative tools, or support the manufacturing of technology test samples or components necessary for testing. The proposals must include technical mentoring for the selected recipients of the FSTP as well as the set-up of additional measures to support the recipients of the FSTP business case.
Types of activities
The following types of activities are eligible for this topic:
Types of activities
(art 10(3) EDF Regulation)
Eligible?
(a)
Activities that aim to create, underpin and improve knowledge, products and technologies, including disruptive technologies, which can achieve significant effects in the area of defence (generating knowledge)
No
(b)
Activities that aim to increase interoperability and resilience, including secured production and exchange of data, to master critical defence technologies, to strengthen the security of supply or to enable the effective exploitation of results for defence products and technologies (integrating knowledge)
Yes(optional)
(c)
Studies, such as feasibility studies to explore the feasibility of new or upgraded products, technologies, processes, services and solutions
Yes
(mandatory)
(d)
Design of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology as well as the definition of the technical specifications on which such design has been developed, including partial tests for risk reduction in an industrial or representative environment
Yes
(mandatory)
(e)
System prototyping of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology
Yes
(mandatory)
(f)
Testing of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology
Yes
(mandatory)
(g)
Qualification of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology
Yes
(optional)
(h)
Certification of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology
Yes
(optional)
(i)
Development of technologies or assets increasing efficiency across the life cycle of defence products and technologies
Yes(optional)
Accordingly, the proposals must cover at least the following tasks as part of mandatory activities:
Concerning the implementation of the FSTP, the proposals must cover the following tasks:
In addition, the proposals must substantiate synergies and complementarities with foreseen, ongoing or completed activities in the field of ground combat capabilities and Force protection and mobility, notably those described in the call topic on Force protection and advanced soldier systems beyond current programmes/Generic Open Soldier Systems Architecture under the Preparatory Action on Defence Research (PADR), and the EDF call topics EDF-2021-PROTMOB-D-SS on Soldier Systems and EDF-2022-MATCOMP-SMT on Smart and multifunctional textiles.
Functional requirements
Considering the experience gained from existing deployed soldier systems, including usage of large numbers of UxS, the proposed Soldier System and Capability Suites sub-systems should meet the following functional requirements:
In order to meet the above requirements, the proposed soldier system and the devices and capability suites associated with the soldier system should demonstrate the following:
In addition, the FSTP includes the following specific requirements:
[1]
1. Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layout
described in section 5 of the call document. (available shortly)
Proposal page limits and layout: described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System.
2. Eligible Countries
described in section 6 of the call document.
3. Other Eligible Conditions
described in section 6 of the call document.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion
described in section 7 of the call document.
5a. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes
described section 8 of the call document and the Online Manual.
5b. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds
described in section 9 of the call document.
5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement
described in section 4 of the call document.
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants
described in section 10 of the call document.
Call document and annexes:
Call document
Application form templates
Standard application form (EDF) — the application form specific to this call is available in the Submission System
Detailed budget table (EDF DA)
Participant information (EDF)
List of infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources (EDF)
Cofinancing declaration (EDF DA, DA LS AND ASAP)
Actual indirect cost methodology declaration (EDF)
Harmonised capability declaration (EDF DA AND DA LS) 
Declaration on procurement intent and common specifications (EDF DA AND DA LS) 
Ownership control declaration 
PRS declaration (EDF) 
Model Grant Agreements (MGA)
EDF, ASAP and EDIRPA MGA 
Additional documents:
EDF Annual Work Programme
EDF Regulation 2021/697
EDF Programme Security Instruction (PSI)
EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment 
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement 
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual 
Funding & Tenders Portal Terms and Conditions 
Funding & Tenders Portal Privacy Statement
Applicants asked the EU 7 questions about this call and the EU published the answers. They clarify the call documents but do not replace them.
As a general principle, it is required that applicants use only the templates provided on the Funding & Tenders Portal. These templates have been designed in order to capture the information necessary to assess the eligibility of the proposal.
For development actions, as a derogation to this general principle, applicants may replace the following specific templates ‘harmonised capability declaration’ or ‘declaration on procurement intent and common specification’, with alternative forms such as a Letter of Intent (LoI) or a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), if deemed more appropriate. From an evaluation standpoint, no difference will be made between the available templates and the alternative forms as long as they contain the same level of detail and information and are signed by the competent authorities.
For research actions, none of these above-mentioned templates are mandatory (not part of the eligibility nor the award criteria).
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 13 Sept 2025
In the “Tpl_Detailed Budget Table” under EDF-2025, when filling in the ‘Purchases’ section of the resource sheet(s) and running “Update content”, only the first line of the “travel and subsistence” is transferred to the Summary and Summary per Activity worksheets, while the added lines and the costs from ‘Equipment’ and ‘Other goods, works and services’ are ignored. What should I do?
Due to a technical issue, for cost category: “C.1Travel and subsistence” in the ‘resource’ sheets, please use only one row and do not use the function/button additional row. Adjust the number of trips, the costs and the description accordingly.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 10 Oct 2025
EDF Call texts may envisage that beneficiaries shall provide Financial Support to Third Party (FSTP), in accordance with the requirements set out in Article 207 of the EU Financial Regulation, the annual EDF Work Programme and the Call topic Description.
The FSTP is one of the cost categories eligible in EDF, if provided in the call conditions. The maximum amount of financial support that can be paid to a third party shall not exceed the amount indicated by the EDF Call text. FSTP should be issued in the form of lump sum grants and its funding rate is 100%, regardless of the specific EDF type of activity under which the FSTP takes place.
The Call conditions do not specify the activity to use when allocating the costs for FSTP. Unless otherwise provided for, the recipients of FSTP may be involved in any type of activity indicated as eligible for support from the Fund by the EDF Call text.
In EDF development actions, activities are funded at different funding rates. However, the amounts granted to the third parties should be 100% reimbursed to the consortium by the EU contribution.
To represent this situation in the Detailed Budget Table Annex, the consortium needs to calculate the estimates as follows.
FSTP costs = Estimated amount provided to TP / funding rate
In the example, EUR 100 provided to TP corresponds to EUR 111.12 (EUR 100 / 90%)
The following example shows how to declare the costs of one FSTP contribution of the maximum EUR 60 000 allowed in the call.
FSTP costs = EUR 60 000 / 90% = EUR 66 666.67
Apart from the amounts provided to the third party, the consortium can declare costs related to the management of the FSTP (evaluation, implementation, communication…)
To facilitate the tracking of the activity, it is advised to create a specific Work Package (WP) for FSTP. In the Detailed Budget Table tab for Studies, the consortium encodes the effort related to this WP (and if necessary other costs categories). In the example effort is 1PM.
In the Summary per activity table, the costs related to the effort of this WP are included in the personnel costs (under the reporting methodology chosen by the beneficiary). In the example cost of the 1PM equals EUR 80 000.
In the table below, now we can see the following costs:
And the EU contribution:
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 11 Aug 2025
The provision at submission stage of the Procurement intent/common technical specifications declaration and of the Harmonised capability requirements declaration is mandatory if and only if:
-For the requirement of “Procurement intent” and common technical specifications: it pertains to a development action covering prototyping, testing, qualification and/or certification
-For Harmonised capability requirements: it pertains to a development action covering design
However, the template for these declarations is not mandatory: it means that another template than the one provided by the Commission can be used (e.g. template from Member States like a Letter of Intent) under the condition that it contains the same information and the same level of details as the one requested in the Commission templates.
The Harmonised capability declaration confirms that the project proposal is based on Harmonised defence capability requirements jointly agreed by at least 2 Member States/Norway.
When it comes to the provision of the common technical specifications or the harmonised capability requirements mentioned in those declarations, you have the possibility either to provide them 1) at submission stage or 2) to provide them later during the action subject to the following conditions:
-Common technical specifications: if your development action also covers design, as a deliverable resulting from the design activity, before starting the prototyping, testing, qualification or certification activities
-Harmonised capability requirements: if your development action also covers studies, as a deliverable resulting from the studies activity, before the starting the design activity
We would suggest you get in touch with your National EDF Focal Point to guide you to the relevant national authority: defence-industry-space.ec.europa.eu
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 27 Feb 2026
According to the Call Document: “The maximum amount to be granted to each third party is EUR 60 000 (see Section 10) for a minimum period of 6 months.”
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 16 Oct 2025
The proposal must be drafted following the EDF call conditions. In addition, the proposal must respond to the mandatory activities of the topic EDF-2025-DA-ENERENV-APEM: Aircraft propulsion and energy management systems.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 10 Jun 2025
Due to a clerical error an older version of the Ownership and Control Declaration template was available in some EDF 2025 topics. However, there is no significant difference between the different versions for EDF, so both versions can be used.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 11 Sept 2025
Confirm the current call documents and submission conditions with the funding authority.
View on EU portal ↗Source: EU Funding & Tenders Portal · synced 2026-11-09
A free account keeps your shortlist and sends deadline reminders. The EUACC connector brings this call, its FAQs, past winners and similar calls into Claude or ChatGPT, so you can check fit and draft with sources.