Loading page...
Loading page...
This round is closed. Synced from the EU Funding & Tenders Portal on 9 November 2026.
Projects the EU funded under this call, with the organisation that led each one.
DEEP-TECHDisruptive Underwater Technology Capability Enabler for EU Next-Generation Deep-Sea Operations and Autonomous Subsea Technologies
Led by Inesc Tec - Instituto de Engenhariade Sistemas e Computadores, Tecnologia e Ciencia · Portugal · 2026 · Official record ↗
ABYSSAAdvanced Breakthrough sYstems for SubSea Autonomy
Led by Fincantieri SpA · Italy · 2026 · Official record ↗
Based on projects the EU funded on the same subject in this programme.
Each one links to its EU funding record and the partners it works with: a starting list for building a consortium.
Expected Impact:The outcome should contribute to:
Objective:Following the emergence of geopolitical instability in Europe and recent acts of sabotage on underwater critical infrastructures, it is evident that the vulnerability of assets such as underwater strategic pipelines, cables, communication backbones and offshore infrastructures, requires resolute measures to ensure their safety and resilience with a specific focus on Seabed Warfare (SBW).
Next generation silent submarines are an example of new forms of threats that need to be countered by effective response capabilities supporting the various defensive missions. Other examples of threats are unmanned vehicle (UxV) carriers that can target energy pipelines, spoofing data from the submerged communication backbones and cutting power energy cables.
International cooperation projects under the auspices of the EU (PESCO, EDF) and NATO (JCG MUS, Smart Defence) have already been initiated to counter these emerging threats.
However, further dedicated research focusing on the evaluation of potential technologies to cope with the above needs is necessary. In particular, this research must prioritise on delivering of technologies to EU defence capabilities that are expected to enable solutions for monitoring and defending underwater critical assets as well as responding to threats in deep waters (water having a depth greater than 200 metres) up to 6000 meters (m) in depth.
Specific objective
Due to a growing number of sabotage acts on critical underwater infrastructure, SBW has gained a very high level of interest for many EU navies. It is therefore necessary to be able to counter the various threat types operating in deep waters up to 6000 m in depth. Most of today's surveillance and reaction systems currently in service in Western navies have been developed to operate at limited depths, and not in the immediate proximity of the seabed. For many of these systems, extension to new operational requirements is hampered by several technological barriers. For example, with existing technologies the maximum operating depth of vehicles based on a pressure-resistant hull (such as traditional torpedoes) is insufficient for new and emerging operational scenarios.
An extensive and precise research activity, focused on "great-depth enabling technologies", could represent an important intermediate step towards an optimised and more efficient future SBW. The results of the research activity could facilitate and speed up the design of new systems specifically conceived and optimised for the operation in the new operational scenarios. At the same time, these new great-depth technologies could facilitate the adaptation of current systems to new operational requirements.
Proposals are expected to reach technology readiness level (TRL) 5.
Scope:The aim is to progress in undersea operations (e.g., SBW) in deep waters up to a depth of 6000 m, with a concept phase to study and evaluate technologies suitable for platforms and payloads to allow unmanned underwater vehicles (UUV), detection systems, warning systems, communication systems, and weapon systems to perform deep water undersea missions (e.g., SBW missions), or even to be applied on fixed elements such as monitoring systems.
The proposals must identify defence use cases and justify the relevance of the proposed technologies to be addressed with respect to these use cases, taking into account the wider landscape of potential solutions for these use cases and the deployment costs.
Layered defensive depth must be formed and critical areas must be identified where monitoring and protection of the critical undersea infrastructure must be extended.
Types of activities
The following types of activities are eligible for this topic:
Types of activities
(art 10(3) EDF Regulation)
Eligible?
(a)
Activities that aim to create, underpin and improve knowledge, products and technologies, including disruptive technologies, which can achieve significant effects in the area of defence (generating knowledge)
Yes
(mandatory)
(b)
Activities that aim to increase interoperability and resilience, including secured production and exchange of data, to master critical defence technologies, to strengthen the security of supply or to enable the effective exploitation of results for defence products and technologies (integrating knowledge)
Yes
(optional)
(c)
Studies, such as feasibility studies to explore the feasibility of new or upgraded products, technologies, processes, services and solutions
Yes
(mandatory)
(d)
Design of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology as well as the definition of the technical specifications on which such design has been developed, including partial tests for risk reduction in an industrial or representative environment
Yes
(optional)
(e)
System prototyping of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology
No
(f)
Testing of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology
No
(g)
Qualification of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology
No
(h)
Certification of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology
No
(i)
Development of technologies or assets increasing efficiency across the life cycle of defence products and technologies
No
Accordingly, the proposals must cover at least the following tasks as part of mandatory activities:
In addition, the proposals should cover the following tasks:
The proposals may also cover the following tasks:
The proposals should substantiate synergies and complementarity with foreseen, ongoing or completed activities in the field of underwater warfare, notably those described in the call topic EDF-2023-DA-UWW-ASW on Unmanned Anti-Submarine and Seabed Warfare.
Functional requirements
The proposed product and technologies should meet the following functional requirements where applicable for the domains addressed:
1. Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layout
described in section 5 of the call document.
Proposal page limits and layout: described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System.
2. Eligible Countries
described in section 6 of the call document.
3. Other Eligible Conditions
described in section 6 of the call document.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion
described in section 7 of the call document.
5a. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes
described section 8 of the call document and the Online Manual.
5b. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds
described in section 9 of the call document.
5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement
described in section 4 of the call document.
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants
described in section 10 of the call document.
Call document and annexes:
Call document
Application form templates
Standard application form (EDF) — the application form specific to this call is available in the Submission System
Detailed budget table (EDF LS RA) (available shortly)
Participant information (EDF)
List of infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources (EDF)
Actual indirect cost methodology declaration (EDF) 
Ownership control declaration 
PRS declaration (EDF) 
Model Grant Agreements (MGA)
EDF, ASAP and EDIRPA Lump Sum MGA 
Additional documents:
EDF Annual Work Programme
EDF Regulation 2021/697
EDF Programme Security Instruction (PSI)
 
EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment 
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement 
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual 
Funding & Tenders Portal Terms and Conditions 
Funding & Tenders Portal Privacy Statement
Applicants asked the EU 2 questions about this call and the EU published the answers. They clarify the call documents but do not replace them.
As a general principle, it is required that applicants use only the templates provided on the Funding & Tenders Portal. These templates have been designed in order to capture the information necessary to assess the eligibility of the proposal.
For development actions, as a derogation to this general principle, applicants may replace the following specific templates ‘harmonised capability declaration’ or ‘declaration on procurement intent and common specification’, with alternative forms such as a Letter of Intent (LoI) or a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), if deemed more appropriate. From an evaluation standpoint, no difference will be made between the available templates and the alternative forms as long as they contain the same level of detail and information and are signed by the competent authorities.
For research actions, none of these above-mentioned templates are mandatory (not part of the eligibility nor the award criteria).
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 13 Sept 2025
Due to a clerical error an older version of the Ownership and Control Declaration template was available in some EDF 2025 topics. However, there is no significant difference between the different versions for EDF, so both versions can be used.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 11 Sept 2025
Confirm the current call documents and submission conditions with the funding authority.
View on EU portal ↗Source: EU Funding & Tenders Portal · synced 2026-11-09
A free account keeps your shortlist and sends deadline reminders. The EUACC connector brings this call, its FAQs, past winners and similar calls into Claude or ChatGPT, so you can check fit and draft with sources.