Loading page...
Loading page...
This round is closed. The next round and similar open calls are listed below. Synced from the EU Funding & Tenders Portal on 9 November 2026.
This call is closed. These open or upcoming calls fund the closest work.
Based on projects the EU funded on the same subject in this programme.
MeDeMAPMapping Media for Future Democracies
HORIZON-CL2-2022-DEMOCRACY-01-06 · 2023 · Official record ↗
ReMeDRESILIENT MEDIA FOR DEMOCRACY IN THE DIGITAL AGE
HORIZON-CL2-2022-DEMOCRACY-01-06 · 2023 · Official record ↗
SoMe4DemSocial media for democracy – understanding the causal mechanisms of digital citizenship
HORIZON-CL2-2022-DEMOCRACY-01-07 · 2023 · Official record ↗
SMIDGESocial Media narratives: addressing extremism in middle age
HORIZON-CL2-2022-DEMOCRACY-01-05 · 2023 · Official record ↗
PROCLAIMPROCLAIM: Polarization, Radicalization and Polarization, Radicalization and extremism Online– identifying Covert hate speech in state-of-the-art Artificial Intelligence technologies and social Media
HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-05 · 2026 · Official record ↗
EuropeanCity2European City Squared: Computational Social Science Simulation for Democracy
HORIZON-CL2-2024-DEMOCRACY-01-06 · 2025 · Official record ↗
TWONTWin of Online Social Networks
HORIZON-CL2-2022-DEMOCRACY-01-07 · 2023 · Official record ↗
Fair MusEPromoting Fairness of the Music Ecosystem in a Platform-Dominated and Post-Pandemic Europe
HORIZON-CL2-2022-HERITAGE-01-05 · 2023 · Official record ↗
Each one links to its EU funding record and the partners it works with: a starting list for building a consortium.
Projects should contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:
Democracies are at risk when reliable and independent journalism is at risk. Yet, in order to be truly independent, media need sustainable financing models. At present, journalistic newsrooms are under severe economic pressure. Social media forces them to compete for citizens’ attention with other forms of infotainment, which sometimes entail unverified opinions and low-quality or malicious sources. To promote a well-informed democratic debate, citizens must be able to distinguish quality journalism abiding by professional standards, from opinion pieces and other forms of content, as free speech can thrive in ecosystems that enhance access to verified information and empower citizens to recognise it. Such ecosystems need to help distinguish sources that apply journalistic principles, including methods to ensure accuracy, independence, objectivity, impartiality, inclusivity and plural viewpoints.
To compete in the digital age, European media need to embrace innovation. The Commission’s 2023 European Media industry outlook[1] signalled that “an early adoption and usage of new technologies is key to adapt and open new markets”. Thus, applicants are invited to work together with news media organisations from the start to enhance innovation across the news media sectors, including by designing industrial and user-driven applications, on areas and aspects such as:
a) development and take up of methods to recognise content produced with journalistic standards (e.g. through trust indicators, browser plugins, etc.), to categorise such content (e.g. through industry-led crawlers, common taxonomies, metadata standards, etc.) and to promote such content (e.g. through inclusive and transparent news-oriented algorithms, recommender systems that show multiple views and prioritise quality information);
b) identification of AI models that can help media build attractive services (e.g. chat bots, search tools, aggregators) and other relevant models which can generate revenues (e.g. dynamic paywalls, advertising, copyright revenues, etc.);
c) innovative methods to ensure user-centric design and user engagement strategies, in compliance with journalistic standards;
d) roll-out of these models and methods towards the development of truly pan-European innovative platforms and/or interoperable standards within the project lifetime;
e) initiatives to federate media industries along a joint innovation agenda.
Innovation projects should focus on concrete ways to help journalistic content serve democracy by addressing aspects such as:
Proposals are encouraged to investigate the behavioural dimensions of news consumption, focusing on how reader habits, trust, and perceptions influence engagement with journalism. This may include examining the role of behavioural science in designing interventions (such as nudges, gamification, or educational tools) to counter misinformation and strengthen critical thinking among audiences. Proposals are also encouraged to explore the evolving trust dynamics between human-curated journalism and AI-driven news delivery, addressing how public perceptions of reliability, bias, and transparency differ across these sources.
Where relevant, proposals are encouraged to investigate the need for transparency and accountability mechanisms for influencers and content creators who rely on media content in their work. This may entail advocating for clear disclosure of sources, partnerships, and potential biases, as well as fostering collaboration between content creators and media actors, to amplify the visibility and credibility of reliable information sources, ensuring audiences are informed by fact-based, ethically produced content.
Projects are encouraged to involve the relevant parts of the news media ecosystems to ensure take-up of the proposed models. All news media segments are eligible under this action (public, private media, sectoral media, etc) and collaboration across segments and across borders is encouraged. The participation in the consortia of research and academic actors from relevant disciplines, such as information science and media studies, as well as tech companies (e.g. ad-tech or other) to build workable prototypes, and SSH, is strongly encouraged. Where applicable, applicants should leverage the data and services available through European Research Infrastructures federated under the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC), as well as data from relevant Data Spaces.
Clustering and cooperation among the selected projects under this topic are strongly encouraged.
[1] The European Media Industry Outlook | Shaping Europe’s digital future
1. Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layout
As described in Annex A and Annex E of the Horizon Europe Work Programme General Annexes.
Proposal page limits and layout: described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System.
The page limit of the Part B of the Innovation Action (IA) application using lump sum is 45 pages.
In addition, it is mandatory to submit a detailed budget table using the template available in the Submission System.
2. Eligible Countries
As described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.
3. Other Eligible Conditions
Subject to restrictions for the protection of European communication networks.
In order to achieve the expected outcomes, consortia must include, as beneficiaries or affiliated entities, at least one news media organisation[[ News media organisations are those in which a core activity is the regular production and dissemination of professional news content and/or factual programming, irrespective of its format (audio-visual media, broadcasting, printed news, newswires, multimedia, radio, online, etc.), under the editorial workflows, standards and responsibility of the said organisation.]].
In addition, as described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion
As described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5a. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds
As described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5b. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes
As described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual.
5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement
As described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes.
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants
Eligible costs will take the form of a lump sum as defined in the Decision of 7 July 2021 authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – and in actions under the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2021-2025) [[This decision is available on the Funding and Tenders Portal, in the reference documents section for Horizon Europe, under ‘Simplified costs decisions’ or through this link: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/ls-decision_he_en.pdf]].
The granting authority may, up to 4 years after the end of the action, object to a transfer of ownership or to the exclusive licensing of results, as set out in the specific provision of Annex 5.
In addition, as described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes.
As described in the specific topic of the Work Programme.
Application and evaluation forms and model grant agreement (MGA):
Application form templates — the application form specific to this call is available in the Submission System
Standard application form (HE RIA, IA)
Evaluation form templates — will be used with the necessary adaptations
Standard evaluation form (HE RIA, IA) 
Guidance
HE Programme Guide 
Model Grant Agreements (MGA)
Lump Sum MGA 
Call-specific instructions 
Detailed budget table (HE LS) 
Guidance: "Lump sums - what do I need to know?"
Additional documents:
HE Main Work Programme 2026-2027 – 1. General Introduction
HE Main Work Programme 2026-2027 – 5. Culture, Creativity and Inclusive Society
HE Main Work Programme 2026-2027 – 15. General Annexes
HE Programme Guide
HE Framework Programme 2021/695
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764
EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509
Decision authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual 
Funding & Tenders Portal Terms and Conditions 
Funding & Tenders Portal Privacy Statement
Applicants asked the EU 7 questions about this call and the EU published the answers. They clarify the call documents but do not replace them.
The Horizon-CL2-2026-01 call is using the new lump sum web forms in the Part A section.
If your lump sum budget in Part A contains any cost items in cost category C (‘Purchase costs’) and/or D (‘Other cost categories’), please make sure to justify these items in the comments box for the participant(s) concerned in the respective work package(s) in the Part A (web forms).
The reason is that the proposal template of 2026 calls was simplified, and this information was removed from Part B, bringing it closer to the relevant budget items (i.e. table 3.1h ‘Purchase costs’ has been simplified and only major equipment costs need to be included in Part B of the proposal, while tables 3.1i ‘Other costs categories’ and 3.1j ‘In kind contributions’ are not needed anymore in the proposal Part B).
Please include justification in the comments section of the web form of the concerned beneficiary and work package, if you are in any of the following situations:
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 27 Oct 2026
Please visit the Horizon Europe page dedicated to lump sum funding, look for the latest webinar, guidance documents or practical suggestions on the preparation of the lump sum budget.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 21 Sept 2026
Yes, all topics of the call Horizon-CL2-2026-01 use lump sum funding.
In this call the previous Excel annex is integrated in the Part A section of the application form.
The proposal must contain a completed detailed budget section in the Part A section. Please make sure that the table contains all participants, list of work packages, and that you complete the detailed budget calculations together with the person months for each participant per work package, besides any depreciation costs.
The new web form uses a new layout and navigation, but contains the same information as the previously used versions.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 19 Aug 2026
For beneficiaries receiving an operating grant, indirect costs are not eligible. Although the indirect costs are automatically calculated and added to the totals, the applicant with an operating grant should adjust the amount entered in the budget table by subtracting the indirect costs in the Requested EU Contribution. Applicants are expected to explain this in the comments section of the budget calculations. If the proposal is selected for funding, the indirect costs calculated automatically by the system will be adjusted accordingly in the requested amount.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 23 Jul 2026
Yes, as the topic has additional eligibility criteria, you are requested to upload additional document(s) to provide further details for the eligibility check of the proposal. Please download the required template from the Submission System.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 15 Sept 2026
Please read the guidance included in the proposal template (part B) of Horizon with regard to the use of generative AI tools for the preparation of the proposal af_he-csa_en.pdfPDF.
When considering the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools for the preparation of the proposal, it is imperative to exercise caution and careful consideration. The AI-generated content should be thoroughly reviewed and validated by the applicants to ensure its appropriateness and accuracy, as well as its compliance with intellectual property regulations. Applicants are fully responsible for the content of the proposal (even those parts produced by the AI tool) and must be transparent in disclosing which AI tools were used and how they were utilized.
Specifically, applicants are required to:
• Verify the accuracy, validity, and appropriateness of the content and any citations generated by the AI tool and correct any errors or inconsistencies.
• Provide a list of sources used to generate content and citations, including those generated by the AI tool. Double-check citations to ensure they are accurate and properly referenced.
• Be conscious of the potential for plagiarism where the AI tool may have reproduced substantial text from other sources. Check the original sources to be sure you are not plagiarizing someone else’s work.
• Acknowledge the limitations of the AI tool in the proposal preparation, including the potential for bias, errors, and gaps in knowledge.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 8 Sept 2026
Please visit the IT HOW TO related to proposal submission on webgate.ec.europa.eu.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 7 Sept 2026
Confirm the current call documents and submission conditions with the funding authority.
View on EU portal ↗Source: EU Funding & Tenders Portal · synced 2026-11-09
A free account keeps your shortlist and sends deadline reminders. The EUACC connector brings this call, its FAQs, past winners and similar calls into Claude or ChatGPT, so you can check fit and draft with sources.