Supporting post-conflict democracy and reconstruction

The Horizon-CL2-2026-01 call is using the new lump sum web forms in the Part A section.

If your lump sum budget in Part A contains any cost items in cost category C (‘Purchase costs’) and/or D (‘Other cost categories’), please make sure to justify these items in the comments box for the participant(s) concerned in the respective work package(s) in the Part A (web forms).

The reason is that the proposal template of 2026 calls was simplified, and this information was removed from Part B, bringing it closer to the relevant budget items (i.e. table 3.1h ‘Purchase costs’ has been simplified and only major equipment costs need to be included in Part B of the proposal, while tables 3.1i ‘Other costs categories’ and 3.1j ‘In kind contributions’ are not needed anymore in the proposal Part B).

Please include justification in the comments section of the web form of the concerned beneficiary and work package, if you are in any of the following situations:

• If the sum of the costs for ’travel and subsistence’, ‘equipment’, and ‘other goods, works and services’ (i.e. the purchase costs) exceeds 15% of the personnel costs for a participant. If this is the case, justify the most expensive cost item(s) up to the level that the remaining costs are below 15% of personnel costs.
• If other cost categories (e.g. internally invoiced goods and services) are used. The full amount is to be justified.
• If in-kind contributions are used (non-financial resources made available free of charge by third parties, which must be included as direct costs in the corresponding cost category, e.g. personnel costs or purchase costs for equipment). The full amount is to be justified.

Please visit the Horizon Europe page dedicated to lump sum funding, look for the latest webinar, guidance documents or practical suggestions on the preparation of the lump sum budget.

Yes, all topics of the call Horizon-CL2-2026-01 use lump sum funding.

In this call the previous Excel annex is integrated in the Part A section of the application form.

The proposal must contain a completed detailed budget section in the Part A section. Please make sure that the table contains all participants, list of work packages, and that you complete the detailed budget calculations together with the person months for each participant per work package, besides any depreciation costs.

The new web form uses a new layout and navigation, but contains the same information as the previously used versions.

For beneficiaries receiving an operating grant, indirect costs are not eligible. Although the indirect costs are automatically calculated and added to the totals, the applicant with an operating grant should adjust the amount entered in the budget table by subtracting the indirect costs in the Requested EU Contribution. Applicants are expected to explain this in the comments section of the budget calculations. If the proposal is selected for funding, the indirect costs calculated automatically by the system will be adjusted accordingly in the requested amount.

Please read the guidance included in the proposal template (part B) of Horizon with regard to the use of generative AI tools for the preparation of the proposal af_he-csa_en.pdfPDF.

When considering the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools for the preparation of the proposal, it is imperative to exercise caution and careful consideration. The AI-generated content should be thoroughly reviewed and validated by the applicants to ensure its appropriateness and accuracy, as well as its compliance with intellectual property regulations. Applicants are fully responsible for the content of the proposal (even those parts produced by the AI tool) and must be transparent in disclosing which AI tools were used and how they were utilized.

Specifically, applicants are required to:

• Verify the accuracy, validity, and appropriateness of the content and any citations generated by the AI tool and correct any errors or inconsistencies.

• Provide a list of sources used to generate content and citations, including those generated by the AI tool. Double-check citations to ensure they are accurate and properly referenced.

• Be conscious of the potential for plagiarism where the AI tool may have reproduced substantial text from other sources. Check the original sources to be sure you are not plagiarizing someone else’s work.

• Acknowledge the limitations of the AI tool in the proposal preparation, including the potential for bias, errors, and gaps in knowledge.

Please visit the IT HOW TO related to proposal submission on webgate.ec.europa.eu.

Yes, proposals are expected to include case studies, even if not explicitly mandated. The scope and expected outcomes imply the need for empirical analysis to provide evidence-based recommendations for policymakers and civil society actors. Proposals should examine complex relationships such as the causes and consequences of conflicts, ethnic violence, legacies of conflict, and reconstruction efforts, which require concrete examples to draw meaningful conclusions. Interdisciplinary and participatory approaches, engaging local stakeholders and accounting for historical and cultural contexts, further underscore the importance of grounded research in specific post-conflict settings. It is recommended to include three well-justified case studies, such as Ukraine, Colombia, Rwanda, or Bosnia, to demonstrate transferable insights and enable comparative analysis of different reconstruction challenges, for example urban versus rural settings or short-term versus protracted conflicts.

Yes, civil wars are fully included in the call’s scope, which explicitly covers conflict and post-conflict areas. This includes internal or intrastate conflicts such as civil wars, ethnic violence, and secessionist movements, as well as interstate wars. Key themes relevant to civil wars include the destruction of institutions and social fabric, ethnic violence and inequalities, challenges of reconciliation and post-war power-sharing, and the role of local actors such as non-state armed groups, community militias, and local governance structures.

It appears that the word “attention” is missing.

The intended sentence should likely read: “In addition, particular attention could be brought to the role of women as peacebuilders"