Loading page...
Loading page...
This round is closed. The next round and similar open calls are listed below. Synced from the EU Funding & Tenders Portal on 9 November 2026.
This call is closed. These open or upcoming calls fund the closest work.
Based on projects the EU funded on the same subject in this programme.
ReMeDRESILIENT MEDIA FOR DEMOCRACY IN THE DIGITAL AGE
HORIZON-CL2-2022-DEMOCRACY-01-06 · 2023 · Official record ↗
MeDeMAPMapping Media for Future Democracies
HORIZON-CL2-2022-DEMOCRACY-01-06 · 2023 · Official record ↗
SoMe4DemSocial media for democracy – understanding the causal mechanisms of digital citizenship
HORIZON-CL2-2022-DEMOCRACY-01-07 · 2023 · Official record ↗
SMIDGESocial Media narratives: addressing extremism in middle age
HORIZON-CL2-2022-DEMOCRACY-01-05 · 2023 · Official record ↗
PROCLAIMPROCLAIM: Polarization, Radicalization and Polarization, Radicalization and extremism Online– identifying Covert hate speech in state-of-the-art Artificial Intelligence technologies and social Media
HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-05 · 2026 · Official record ↗
EuropeanCity2European City Squared: Computational Social Science Simulation for Democracy
HORIZON-CL2-2024-DEMOCRACY-01-06 · 2025 · Official record ↗
TWONTWin of Online Social Networks
HORIZON-CL2-2022-DEMOCRACY-01-07 · 2023 · Official record ↗
Fair MusEPromoting Fairness of the Music Ecosystem in a Platform-Dominated and Post-Pandemic Europe
HORIZON-CL2-2022-HERITAGE-01-05 · 2023 · Official record ↗
Each one links to its EU funding record and the partners it works with: a starting list for building a consortium.
Projects should contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:
As recalled by the “Safer together” report[1], “over the past years, the Commission has already taken steps to counter hybrid threats (including foreign information manipulation and interference/FIMI) and enhance democratic resilience across the EU. It adopted, among other initiatives, the European Democracy Action Plan[2] to build more resilient democracies across the EU by promoting free and fair elections, strengthening media freedom, countering disinformation and FIMI and promoting information integrity. With the adoption of the Digital Services Act[3] (DSA) and its binding obligations for online platforms to combat the spread of disinformation, the Commission also strengthened the Code of Practice on Disinformation, which became a Code of Conduct within the framework of the DSA. Moreover, the launch of the European Digital Media Observatory (EDMO) and its hubs increased the capacity to detect, analyse and expose disinformation campaigns.”[4]
The Preparedness Union Strategy[5] underlines how preparedness is a collective responsibility. It also points at the need to make our democracies more resilient, in particular in view of strengthening trust in institutions, which can be crucial in crisis situations as seen for instance during the COVID pandemic. Groups in a vulnerable situation in particular, such as children, senior citizens and persons with disabilities, ethnic or religious minorities, LGBTIQ people, those suffering poverty and/or social exclusion, are disproportionately affected by crises, often exacerbating pre-existing disadvantages, barriers and inequalities.
Disinformation is particularly harmful as it undermines public confidence and can exacerbate the impact of crises. Engaged, informed and empowered citizens are the best guarantee for the resilience of our democracies. Public authorities, schools, universities and training institutions, youth initiatives, civil society organisations and associations, social partners, businesses, local networks and communities, and citizens from an early age, all play a vital role in such collective endeavour, and the proposed research should take a multi-actor approach.
Against this background, the proposed research should explore the complex and dynamic patterns of user behaviours in the digital age, investigating how individuals seek, evaluate, and engage with information online, and offline. Such an exploration will benefit from including an analysis of the emotional dynamics in the dissemination of disinformation and polarization on digital platforms. This is especially relevant in crisis contexts in which foreign information manipulation and disinformation can be leveraged to increase panic and confusion. Proposals should investigate how algorithms amplify emotive content, fostering polarization and undermining trust in democratic institutions, as well as crisis response and develop digital and media literacy strategies to counter emotionally manipulative narratives, such as populist and post-truth discourses.
The research should also examine the factors that influence digital literacy, information-seeking habits, and online engagement, with a focus on improving citizen’s’ participation and engagement through digital means (including through civic tech) and informed decision-making. At a time when disinformation is used to sow discord by exploiting the fears of citizens, it is crucial to ensure that democratic decisions are informed by the most reliable and widely accepted facts and sources of information available. Research should explore the critical role digital and media literacy can play in fostering societal resilience and information integrity, by allowing citizens to navigate and resist misinformation and disinformation.
Proposals should plan a critical assessment of media and digital literacy initiatives[6] to assess whether existing efforts are enhancing citizens’ resilience, or whether new approaches are needed to more effectively equip citizens against evolving manipulation tactics.
Research should identify strategies to improve media literacy and digital and media literacy, in order to enhance critical thinking, promote evidence-based decision-making, and counter the negative impacts of disinformation on democratic societies. To facilitate the generation of practical solutions for educators and policymakers, the research could utilise computational tools, such as Social Network Analysis and Natural Language Processing, to map and mitigate the dissemination of disinformation across multiple platforms. This includes identifying Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviour and analysing both textual and visual content to inform media literacy initiatives.
Proposals are encouraged to identify other relevant EU-funded projects related to media and digital literacy, and to explore potential collaboration opportunities with them. Clustering and cooperation with other selected projects under this topic and other relevant projects are strongly encouraged.
The projects selected for funding are encouraged to collaborate with the JRC to seek synergies with its work on innovation for democracy and public governance.
[1] https://commission.europa.eu/topics/defence/safer-together-path-towards-fully-prepared-union_en
[2] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_2250
[3] https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/digital-services-act_en
[4] https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/european-digital-media-observatory
[5] Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European Preparedness Union Strategy
[6] For instance, “Guidelines for teachers and educators on tackling disinformation and promoting digital literacy through education and training”, Publications Office of the European Union, 2022,https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/28248; or the UNESCO’s “Global Standards for Media and Information Literacy Curricula Development Guidelines”
1. Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layout
As described in Annex A and Annex E of the Horizon Europe Work Programme General Annexes.
Proposal page limits and layout: described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System.
The page limit for the Part B of the Research and Innovation (RIA) application using lump sum is 45 pages. In addition, it is mandatory to submit a detailed budget table, using the template available in the Submission System.
2. Eligible Countries
As described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.
3. Other Eligible Conditions
The Joint Research Centre (JRC) may participate as member of the consortium selected for funding as a beneficiary with zero funding, or as an associated partner. The JRC will not participate in the preparation and submission of the proposal - see General Annex B.
As described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion
As described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5a. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds
As described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5b. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes
As described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual.
5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement
As described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes.
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants
Eligible costs will take the form of a lump sum as defined in the Decision of 7 July 2021 authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – and in actions under the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2021-2025) [[This decision is available on the Funding and Tenders Portal, in the reference documents section for Horizon Europe, under ‘Simplified costs decisions’ or through this link: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/ls-decision_he_en.pdf]].
The granting authority may, up to 4 years after the end of the action, object to a transfer of ownership or to the exclusive licensing of results, as set out in the specific provision of Annex 5.
In addition, as described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes.
As described in the specific topic of the Work Programme.
Application and evaluation forms and model grant agreement (MGA):
Application form templates — the application form specific to this call is available in the Submission System
Standard application form (HE RIA, IA)
Evaluation form templates — will be used with the necessary adaptations
Standard evaluation form (HE RIA, IA) 
Guidance
HE Programme Guide 
Model Grant Agreements (MGA)
Lump Sum MGA 
Call-specific instructions 
Detailed budget table (HE LS) 
Guidance: "Lump sums - what do I need to know?"
Additional documents:
HE Main Work Programme 2026-2027 – 1. General Introduction
HE Main Work Programme 2026-2027 – 5. Culture, Creativity and Inclusive Society
HE Main Work Programme 2026-2027 – 15. General Annexes
HE Programme Guide
HE Framework Programme 2021/695
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764
EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509
Decision authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual 
Funding & Tenders Portal Terms and Conditions 
Funding & Tenders Portal Privacy Statement
Applicants asked the EU 7 questions about this call and the EU published the answers. They clarify the call documents but do not replace them.
The Horizon-CL2-2026-01 call is using the new lump sum web forms in the Part A section.
If your lump sum budget in Part A contains any cost items in cost category C (‘Purchase costs’) and/or D (‘Other cost categories’), please make sure to justify these items in the comments box for the participant(s) concerned in the respective work package(s) in the Part A (web forms).
The reason is that the proposal template of 2026 calls was simplified, and this information was removed from Part B, bringing it closer to the relevant budget items (i.e. table 3.1h ‘Purchase costs’ has been simplified and only major equipment costs need to be included in Part B of the proposal, while tables 3.1i ‘Other costs categories’ and 3.1j ‘In kind contributions’ are not needed anymore in the proposal Part B).
Please include justification in the comments section of the web form of the concerned beneficiary and work package, if you are in any of the following situations:
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 27 Oct 2026
Please visit the Horizon Europe page dedicated to lump sum funding, look for the latest webinar, guidance documents or practical suggestions on the preparation of the lump sum budget.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 21 Sept 2026
Yes, all topics of the call Horizon-CL2-2026-01 use lump sum funding.
In this call the previous Excel annex is integrated in the Part A section of the application form.
The proposal must contain a completed detailed budget section in the Part A section. Please make sure that the table contains all participants, list of work packages, and that you complete the detailed budget calculations together with the person months for each participant per work package, besides any depreciation costs.
The new web form uses a new layout and navigation, but contains the same information as the previously used versions.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 19 Aug 2026
For beneficiaries receiving an operating grant, indirect costs are not eligible. Although the indirect costs are automatically calculated and added to the totals, the applicant with an operating grant should adjust the amount entered in the budget table by subtracting the indirect costs in the Requested EU Contribution. Applicants are expected to explain this in the comments section of the budget calculations. If the proposal is selected for funding, the indirect costs calculated automatically by the system will be adjusted accordingly in the requested amount.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 23 Jul 2026
Please read the guidance included in the proposal template (part B) of Horizon with regard to the use of generative AI tools for the preparation of the proposal af_he-csa_en.pdfPDF.
When considering the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools for the preparation of the proposal, it is imperative to exercise caution and careful consideration. The AI-generated content should be thoroughly reviewed and validated by the applicants to ensure its appropriateness and accuracy, as well as its compliance with intellectual property regulations. Applicants are fully responsible for the content of the proposal (even those parts produced by the AI tool) and must be transparent in disclosing which AI tools were used and how they were utilized.
Specifically, applicants are required to:
• Verify the accuracy, validity, and appropriateness of the content and any citations generated by the AI tool and correct any errors or inconsistencies.
• Provide a list of sources used to generate content and citations, including those generated by the AI tool. Double-check citations to ensure they are accurate and properly referenced.
• Be conscious of the potential for plagiarism where the AI tool may have reproduced substantial text from other sources. Check the original sources to be sure you are not plagiarizing someone else’s work.
• Acknowledge the limitations of the AI tool in the proposal preparation, including the potential for bias, errors, and gaps in knowledge.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 8 Sept 2026
Please visit the IT HOW TO related to proposal submission on webgate.ec.europa.eu.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 7 Sept 2026
Please follow the text of the topic itself, by including the kind of actors named in the text. The topic text reads: “Public authorities, schools, universities and training institutions, youth initiatives, civil society organisations and associations, social partners, businesses, local networks and communities, and citizens from an early age, all play a vital role in such collective endeavour, and the proposed research should take a multi-actor approach.”
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 11 Jun 2026
Confirm the current call documents and submission conditions with the funding authority.
View on EU portal ↗Source: EU Funding & Tenders Portal · synced 2026-11-09
A free account keeps your shortlist and sends deadline reminders. The EUACC connector brings this call, its FAQs, past winners and similar calls into Claude or ChatGPT, so you can check fit and draft with sources.