Loading page...
Loading page...
This round is closed. The next round and similar open calls are listed below. Synced from the EU Funding & Tenders Portal on 9 November 2026.
This call is closed. These open or upcoming calls fund the closest work.
Projects the EU funded under this call, with the organisation that led each one.
UPLIFTUnlocking Petrothermal Lithologies through Innovative Fracture Technologies
Led by Gfz Helmholtz-Zentrum Fur Geoforschung · Germany · 2026 · Official record ↗
SHiFTSuperHot geothermal – Integrated demonstration and Flow Testing
Led by Orkuveita Reykjavikur Sf · Iceland · 2026 · Official record ↗
Based on projects the EU funded on the same subject in this programme.
GO-ForwardGeothermal Exploration and Optimization through Forward Modeling and Resource Development
HORIZON-CL5-2023-D3-02-05 · 2024 · Official record ↗
FindHeatA Novel Exploration Toolkit for Finding Geothermal Heat Efficiently and Sustainably
HORIZON-CL5-2023-D3-02-05 · 2024 · Official record ↗
GEOTHERM-FORASupport stakeholders fora on geothermal systems
HORIZON-CL5-2021-D3-02-15 · 2022 · Official record ↗
FuturHistAn integrated typology-based approach to guide the future development of European historic buildings towards a clean energy transition
HORIZON-CL5-2023-D4-01-02 · 2024 · Official record ↗
NEXTBATNext generation technologies for battery systems in transport electrification based on novel design approach to increase performance and reduce carbon footprint
HORIZON-CL5-2022-D2-01-05 · 2023 · Official record ↗
AREANAAVIATION RESEARCH ECOSYSTEM ADVANCED NOVEL APPROACH
HORIZON-CL5-2023-D5-01-10 · 2024 · Official record ↗
URGENTSustainable and affordable URban Geothermal Exploration Novel Technologies and workflows
HORIZON-CL5-2023-D3-02-05 · 2024 · Official record ↗
ECORES WINDNOVEL CIRCULAR RESIN DEVELOPMENT FOR COMPOSITE STRUCTURES IN WIND ENERGY APPLICATIONS
HORIZON-CL5-2023-D3-02-15 · 2024 · Official record ↗
Each one links to its EU funding record and the partners it works with: a starting list for building a consortium.
Expected Outcome:Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:
Scope:Proposals should focus on the demonstration of innovative approaches to resource development in: (i) the area of shallow & low/mid enthalpy geothermal (0-500 meter-depth and temperature below 150ºC) and/or (ii) in the area of deep & high enthalpy geothermal (beyond 500 meter-depth and temperature above 150ºC). Proposals should also expressly identify whether they are addressing the area of (i) shallow geothermal; (ii) deep geothermal; or (iii) both shallow and deep geothermal.
Drilling and subsurface engineering account for a large part of the costs of geothermal projects, and on-field project development contains significant risks due to inherent geological uncertainties. Reducing costs upfront, improving performance, estimating uncertainty, and reducing risk can therefore boost the geothermal capacity deployment rate.
The scope covers advances beyond the state of the art in one/several of the following points:
Proposals should include one or more of the following: robot and AI-physics-based simulation solutions for geothermal resource development, novel cost-efficient drilling methods and equipment, advanced drilling fluids, new materials for casing, cementing and completion, working fluids, logging while drilling, wireline technologies and geosteering high temperature electronics, well architecture and stimulation, closed loop technology, enhanced production pumps, and innovative monitoring systems during geothermal resources exploitation including their integration in digital twins.
Proposals are expected to reduce project development time while ensuring safety of operations and adaptation to specific geothermal environments (including offshore), constraining and quantifying geological uncertainties, reducing field development and seismic risks. They can include standardisation of the drilling equipment enhanced well production, enhanced environmental performance, improve component resistance to corrosion, scaling, high temperature, wear, and mechanical failures, increase energy extraction.
The project must include a clear go/no-go milestone ahead of entering the demonstration phase of the project. Before this go/no-go milestone, delivery of the detailed engineering plans, a techno-economic assessment, and all needed permits for the demonstrator should be foreseen. The project proposal is expected to present a clear and convincing pathway and timeline to obtaining the permits.
Environmental impact of the proposal should be assessed, and mitigation measures considered.
Where relevant, the project is expected to follow FAIR data principles, adopt data quality standards, data integration operating procedures and GDPR-compliant data sharing/access good practices developed by the European research infrastructures.
In order to enhance the benefits of the technology, proposals are expected to develop understandings of how the utilisation of geothermal resources aligns with the cultural values and contextual settings at local to regional level and increase the responsiveness of geothermal energy to diverse societal interests and concerns. To achieve that, an inclusive, early and continuous societal engagement should be enhanced.
In particular, this topic requires the effective contribution of SSH disciplines and the involvement of SSH experts, institutions as well as the inclusion of relevant SSH expertise (applied to social innovation), in order to produce meaningful and significant effects enhancing the societal impact of the related research activities.
1. Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layout
described in Annex A and Annex E of the Horizon Europe Work Programme General Annexes.
Proposal page limits and layout: described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System.
2. Eligible Countries
described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.
3. Other Eligible Conditions
The following exceptions apply: subject to restrictions for the protection of European communication networks.
described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion
described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5a. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds
To ensure a balanced portfolio, grants will be awarded to proposals not only in order of ranking but at least also to one proposal that is the highest ranked within the area of shallow & low/mid enthalpy geothermal (0-500 m depth and temperature below 150ºC) and at least also to one proposal that is the highest ranked within the area of deep & high enthalpy geothermal ( above 500 m depth and temperature above 150ºC), provided that proposals attain all thresholds (and subject to available budget). This condition to ensure a balanced portfolio will also be considered to be met if a proposal addressing both areas is funded.
are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5b. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes
are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual.
5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement
described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes.
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants
described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes.
described in the [specific topic of the Work Programme]
Application and evaluation forms and model grant agreement (MGA):
Application form templates — the application form specific to this call is available in the Submission System
Standard application form (HE RIA, IA)
Evaluation form templates — will be used with the necessary adaptations 
Standard evaluation form (HE RIA, IA) 
Guidance
HE Programme Guide 
Model Grant Agreements (MGA)
HE MGA 
Additional documents:
HE Main Work Programme 2025 – 1. General Introduction
HE Main Work Programme 2025 – 8. Climate, Energy and Mobility
HE Main Work Programme 2025 – 14. General Annexes
HE Programme Guide
HE Framework Programme 2021/695
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764
EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509
Decision authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement 
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual 
Funding & Tenders Portal Terms and Conditions 
Funding & Tenders Portal Privacy Statement
Applicants asked the EU 1 questions about this call and the EU published the answers. They clarify the call documents but do not replace them.
From the topic description:
"The project must include a clear go/no-go milestone ahead of entering the demonstration phase of the project. Before this go/no-go milestone, delivery of the detailed engineering plans, a techno-economic assessment, and all needed permits for the demonstrator should be foreseen. The project proposal is expected to present a clear and convincing pathway and timeline to obtaining the permits."
For this topic, the deployment of the demonstrator(s) is necessary for achieving the expected TRL.
In line with their obligations under the Horizon Europe grant agreement, beneficiaries must immediately inform the granting authority of events or circumstances likely to affect significantly or delay the implementation of the action. This includes events or circumstances that may delay a go decision or lead to a no-go decision.
If the consortium delays the go/no-go decision, it must justify the delay and consider requesting a suspension of the grant. If the grant is suspended it can either be resumed once circumstances allow the consortium to take the go decision and advance to the deployment phase or it can be terminated if there is no realistic prospect to resume within a reasonable timeframe.
If the decision is negative, the consortium must consider requesting the termination of the grant.
If there are delays in the implementation of the action, the granting authority may apply measures under Chapter 5 of the Horizon Europe grant agreement.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 10 Jun 2025
Confirm the current call documents and submission conditions with the funding authority.
View on EU portal ↗Source: EU Funding & Tenders Portal · synced 2026-11-09
A free account keeps your shortlist and sends deadline reminders. The EUACC connector brings this call, its FAQs, past winners and similar calls into Claude or ChatGPT, so you can check fit and draft with sources.