Loading page...
Loading page...
This round is closed. Synced from the EU Funding & Tenders Portal on 9 November 2026.
Projects the EU funded under this call, with the organisation that led each one.
ABIGAIL4DAdvancing Breast cancer Individualised Generative AI for Longitudinal Outcomes
Led by Fundacio Eurecat · Spain · 2026 · Official record ↗
LUMINALUng Modeling and INtelligence for Advanced care: A Digital Twin Approach to Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Led by Aalborg Universitet · Denmark · 2026 · Official record ↗
M4GIC-ILCMulti-modal, Multi-site, Multi-omic, Multi-AGent AI framework for the Clinical management of ILC
Led by Katholieke Universiteit Leuven · Belgium · 2026 · Official record ↗
GLIOGEN-XFrom Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Molecular Signatures: Generative AI for Virtual Biopsy in Gliomas
Led by Siena Imaging s.r.l. · Italy · 2026 · Official record ↗
IMPACT-OCInterpretable Multimodal Predictive Agents and Digital Twins for Ovarian Cancer
Led by Danube Private University GmbH · Austria · 2026 · Official record ↗
PROMETHEUSPROstate cancer Multimodal Explainable Transferable Holistic Expert for Universal Stratification
Led by Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum Heidelberg · Germany · 2026 · Official record ↗
EUcanAIEuropean Unified Cancer diagnostics and treatment AI agent
Led by Ruprecht-Karls-Universitaet Heidelberg · Germany · 2026 · Official record ↗
CONCERTOCarbOn Negative CemEnt fRom ulTra-mafic rOcks
Led by Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CNRS · France · 2025 · 2024 edition · Official record ↗
X-SeeO2Real-time X-ray diffraction and microstructure imaging: accelerating the transformation of cementitious materials into CO2 sinks
Led by Universidad de Malaga · Spain · 2025 · 2024 edition · Official record ↗
C-SINCConcrete products through sustainable and innovative carbon-storing binders
Led by Paebbl AB · Sweden · 2025 · 2024 edition · Official record ↗
Based on recent winners of this scheme in other years.
C-SINCConcrete products through sustainable and innovative carbon-storing binders
HORIZON-EIC-2024-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-02 · 2025 · Official record ↗
CILANTROCARBON-NEGATIVE CEMENT: A TRIBOLOGICAL SOLUTION FOR LIMESTONE DECARBONATION, SILICATION AND CARBON UTILIZATION
HORIZON-EIC-2024-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-02 · 2025 · Official record ↗
MOJITODecarbonized liMe PrOduction through enhanced JoInt dielectric heaTing and waste carbonaceous material additiOn
HORIZON-EIC-2024-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-02 · 2025 · Official record ↗
X-SeeO2Real-time X-ray diffraction and microstructure imaging: accelerating the transformation of cementitious materials into CO2 sinks
HORIZON-EIC-2024-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-02 · 2025 · Official record ↗
ECO-SLAG-CEMENVIRONMENTALLY COMPATIBLE OPTIMIZATION OF EAF SLAG FOR LOW-CARBON ADVANCED GREEN CEMENT
HORIZON-EIC-2024-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-02 · 2025 · Official record ↗
CONCERTOCarbOn Negative CemEnt fRom ulTra-mafic rOcks
HORIZON-EIC-2024-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-02 · 2025 · Official record ↗
RAWComputation for a new age of Resource AWare architecture: waste-sourced and fast-growing bio-based materials
HORIZON-EIC-2023-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-02 · 2024 · Official record ↗
CARBCOMNCARBon-negative COMpression dominant structures for decarbonized and deconstructable CONcrete buildings
HORIZON-EIC-2023-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-02 · 2024 · Official record ↗
Each one links to its EU funding record and the partners it works with: a starting list for building a consortium.
Background and scope
Imaging is a crucial component of cancer clinical protocols, providing detailed morphological, structural, metabolic, and functional information. However, harnessing the full potential of the data generated through medical imaging in clinical settings remains challenging. Clinicians often struggle to combine diverse and large-scale data into a comprehensive view of patient care, disease progression, and treatment efficacy. The inability to seamlessly integrate and interpret diverse data sources result in suboptimal patient outcomes and inefficiencies in the delivery of healthcare.
The integration of traditional Artificial Intelligence (AI) with medical imaging can transform healthcare, but most existing applications are still in their infancy and must overcome a number of challenges to accelerate adoption. These include AI applications being confined to single data modalities, which restricts their overall effectiveness (Monomodal Application); inadequate and insufficient data training, leading to data scarcity and a lack of generalizability, making them less reliable across diverse patient populations, including with regard to gender-sensitivity; and the lack of AI model interpretability, as many AI systems function as "black boxes," providing little insight into their decision-making processes. This lack of transparency limits trust in the systems and their usability in clinical settings.
The goal of this Pathfinder Challenge is to create interactive GenAI autonomous agents and/or a combination of them (super-agent) that provide clinicians with a holistic end to end perspective of patient care, throughout the entire clinical pathway. These agents aim to enhance pattern identification, reduce inconsistencies and errors in diagnoses as well as improve cancer treatment. While the focus is on GenAI, we also encourage the integration of other advanced AI technologies, such as topological and geometric deep learning, neural fields, graph neural networks, etc., which can complement and enhance the robustness and effectiveness of GenAI-based solutions in addressing the challenges of cancer diagnosis and therapy.
The Challenge will support early-stage groundbreaking research projects that will develop and validate novel approaches and concepts for integrating and interpreting multimodal medical imaging and health data. Additionally, it will involve generating reliable synthetic medical data, which will also be pooled to form a common database and used for the development of advanced algorithms.
Specific Objectives
Project proposals under this Challenge should focus on one (and only one) of the following diseases: breast cancer, cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, lung cancer, brain cancer, stomach cancer or colorectal cancer.
Each proposal should address both the following areas (at least one sub-objective from each of the areas):
Area 1: Technological area
Investigate groundbreaking techniques and methodologies for developing GenAI algorithms that combine multidimensional (e.g. time dimension, space dimension) and multimodal data from various sources. These include multiple imaging modalities (e.g., MRI, CT, PET, X-ray), clinical data (e.g., electronic health records, lab results, structured and unstructured clinical data, pathology results, genetics and – omics data, videos, knowledge databases, and other resources). The goal is to provide a comprehensive view of the patient’s condition. The developed algorithms should be capable of producing unified and actionable datasets that can be exploited for the development of the AI tools described in Area 2 (clinical).
Develop GenAI models based on groundbreaking techniques that are in the conceptual or initial experimental phase for medical data augmentation. These models should be capable of creating highly realistic synthetic medical data (images, genomics data, etc.) and generating complementary data from existing sources (for example producing synthetic CT images from MRI images), to support iterative cycles of model training.
Create an initial prototype GenAI model for medical knowledge representation and integration. This model should aim to develop a comprehensive and dynamic medical knowledge base, to identify discrete medical imaging features associated with demographic information and systemic conditions, to improve the interpretability of AI-based models and extract new knowledge not previously identifiable by experts without assistance.
Area 2: Clinical Area
Develop an interactive autonomous agent capable of assessing the likelihood of a patient developing cancer by analysing their medical history, imaging data, and genetic information. The agent should provide personalised health risk predictions, enabling early detection and preventive measures.
Develop novel AI algorithms and architectures that leverages multidimensional and multimodal data integration, along with synthetic data generation, to predict the optimal treatment pathway for specific patient conditions, as well as to forecast disease progression and treatment efficacy providing a comprehensive view of patient care.
Appropriate performance metrics should be considered for the continuous evaluation and testing of the scientific and technical robustness (including accurately quantify uncertainties) of all developed algorithms and architectures in Areas 1 and 2. Rigorous testing against diverse datasets is essential to ensure that the models perform reliably across various patient demographics and conditions, thereby reducing the risk of skewed results and ensuring precision from diagnoses to therapy.
Projects should also conduct proof of concept studies in controlled settings to demonstrate improved and more accurate diagnosis and treatment when compared to current clinical practice. The viability of the developed technologies should be evaluated, guiding further refinement and improvement. For instance, a super-agent could be validated for assisting and/or replacing clinicians through the whole clinical pathway of the patient, providing a holistic view of patient care, that is currently unachievable due to fragmented healthcare systems and associated expertise.
The focus should also be on enhancing the interpretability of AI models/agents, making their decision-making processes more transparent and understandable to clinicians. This could involve developing cutting-edge techniques such as causal inference methods, explainable AI frameworks, or novel visualization tools that provide deeper insights into AI decision-making processes.
The AI models developed under this Challenge are expected to comply with the EU concept for Trustworthy AI, relevant ethical principles, and the AI Act. In addition to focusing on performance, careful attention must be given to data quality, transparency, privacy, and security.
Proposers are encouraged to leverage the data and tools available in the Cancer Image Europe platform (deployed in the context of the European Cancer Imaging Initiative) for their proposed work. In turn they should contribute the datasets, and developed AI tools and models to the platform under agreed conditions. All datasets produced should be described where possible with metadata records in the EU dataset catalogue of the European Health Data Space (EHDS) using the Health DCAT-AP metadata standard.
Projects that address only one of the two ‘Areas’ or other cancer types will be considered "out" of scope.
Expected Outcomes and Impacts:
In support of the European AI Strategy and the Cancer Plan for Europe and the Cancer Mission this Challenge looks to support the development of the next generation models for cancer diagnosis and treatment, with Generative AI.
This Challenge aims to create a collaborative environment where diverse expertise — including for example data science, informatics, oncology, radiology, pathology, medical physics, bioinformatics, geneticists, healthcare administrators, and patient advocacy groups — converges to address the complexities of developing autonomous agents for holistic patient care, through enhanced diagnosis and personalized treatment.
The Challenge aspires to significantly improve patient care and reduce pressure on the healthcare system by leveraging advanced interactive autonomous agents for diagnosis and personalized treatment. By alleviating the burdens on clinicians and ensuring compliance with the EU concept for Trustworthy AI, the initiative will enhance the quality and reliability of medical services. Economically, it promises substantial cost reductions and cost avoidance, leading to long-term improvements in healthcare efficiency and sustainability. Ultimately, this challenge will foster innovation and establish Europe as a leader in the field, delivering profound benefits to patients, healthcare providers, and society at large.
The portfolio of selected projects will be designed to deliver a set of agents/models for improved diagnosis and personalized treatment of the above-mentioned cancers. Specifically, the projects will collaborate to:
- Create a shared database of synthetically generated images to be used across all projects for the development of their algorithms;
- Compare the use of a combination of the agents in the case of multiple cancers;
- Benchmark agents for enhanced diagnosis and personalized treatment selection;
- Define innovative clinical pathways in oncology;
- Externally validate the developed agents within a project at clinical premises of another project in the portfolio;
- Develop standardized methods and frameworks for evaluating AI- Act and Medical Device Regulation (MDR)- compliant generative AI models.
The portfolio of projects to be funded under this Challenge will be composed in such a way that they address ideally all cancers mentioned in this call, apply different technologies, and provide access to relevant clinical facilities and research infrastructures. The following categories will be used for the composition:
Category 1 – type of cancer
Category 2 – type of technology
Category 3 – access to appropriate infrastructure data and ecosystem integration.
Applications for this Challenge with elements that concern the evolution of European communication networks (5G, post-5G and other technologies linked to the evolution of European communication networks) will be subject to restriction for the protection of European communication networks (see Annex II – Section B1)
1. Admissibility and eligibility conditions:
In order to apply, your proposal must meet the general eligibility requirements (see Annex 2) as well as specific eligibility requirements for the Challenge (please see TOPIC DESCRIPTION above).
Please check for particular elements (e.g., specific application focus or technology) in the respective Challenge chapter.
The EIC Pathfinder Challenges support collaborative or individual research and innovation from consortia or from single legal entities established in a Member State or an Associated Country (unless stated otherwise in the specific Challenge chapter). In case of a consortium your proposal must be submitted by the coordinator on behalf of the consortium. Consortia of two entities must be comprised of independent legal entities from two different Member States or Associated Countries. Consortia of three or more entities must include as beneficiaries at least three legal entities, independent from each other and each established in a different country as follows:
The legal entities may for example be universities, research organisations, SMEs, start-ups, natural persons. In the case of single beneficiary projects, mid-caps and larger companies will not be permitted.
Applications with elements that concern the evolution of European communication networks (5G, post-5G and other technologies linked to the evolution of European communication networks) will be subject to restriction for the protection of European communication networks (see Annex II – Section B1).
The standard admissibility and eligibility conditions and the eligibility of applicants from third countries are detailed in Annex 2.
Proposal page limit and layout:
Described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System.
Sections 1 to 3 of the part B of your proposal, corresponding respectively to the evaluation criteria Excellence, Impact, and Quality and Efficiency of the Implementation, must consist of a maximum of 30 format A4 pages. Excess pages will be automatically made invisible, and will not be taken into consideration by the evaluators. Please also consult Annex 2 of the EIC Work Programme 2025.
2. Eligible Countries
Described in Annex 2 of the EIC Work Programme 2025.
3. Other Eligible Conditions
Described in the EIC Work Programme 2025.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion
Described in Annex 2 of the EIC Work Programme 2025.
5a. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds
Described in section II of the EIC Work Programme 2025.
5b. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes
Described in section II of the EIC Work Programme 2025 and the Online Manual.
5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement
Described in section II of the EIC Work Programme 2025.
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants
Please refer to the Lump Sum Model Grant Agreement (Lump Sum MGA) used for Lump Sum EIC actions under Horizon Europe.
7. Specific conditions
Described in the EIC Work Programme 2025.
Call Documents:
EIC Work Programme 2025
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Standard application form (HE EIC Pathfinder Challenges)
Standard evaluation form (HE EIC Pathfinder Challenges)
Challenge Guide
Model Grant Agreements (MGA)
Lump Sum MGA
Call-specific instructions 
Detailed budget table (HE LS) 
Information on clinical studies (HE) 
Guidance: "Lump sums - what do I need to know?"
Additional documents:
HE Programme Guide
HE Framework Programme 2021/695 
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764 
EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment 
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement 
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual 
Funding & Tenders Portal Terms and Conditions 
Funding & Tenders Portal Privacy Statement
Applicants asked the EU 4 questions about this call and the EU published the answers. They clarify the call documents but do not replace them.
The inventor rights are only for those individuals that are explicitly appear as an inventor in a publication or patent filing. This does not include authors of scientific publication, where the authorship role does not include inventorship.
Asked about the 2023 call; check it still appliesRead it on the EU portal ↗Answered 16 Feb 2023
This criterion is applied by calculating how many Member States (MS) and Associated Countries (AC) are represented in the consortium. Consortia with a larger number of MS and AC represented get priority. Associated partners not requesting funding are not taken into account. Countries with several entities are only counted once. Example:
Consortium A has priority over consortium B.
Asked about the 2023 call; check it still appliesRead it on the EU portal ↗Answered 16 Feb 2023
Applicants must include information about the gender of their work package leaders in the application form (part B, table 3.1a – list of work packages). This information will be used to calculate the gender balance criterion. Proposals with a more balanced composition in terms of gender of work package leaders get priority.Work packages for which the gender of the work package leader is not clearly indicated will be counted as contributing to the gender which is already mostly represented. Work package leaders which are leading more than one work package will be counted only once. Proposals where the information on the gender of work package leaders is entirely missing will be counted as 100% imbalanced.
Asked about the 2023 call; check it still appliesRead it on the EU portal ↗Answered 16 Feb 2023
The EIC has a goal to stimulate innovation and the specific provisions on IP are for this purpose.
The underlying intention of the EIC IP provisions is not to take over the valuable activities of the TTOs/KTOs in Europe, but to empower the innovators to commercialise their inventions where the TTO/KTO support is not sufficient. The quality of this support is not equally available in all parts of Europe and we would like to unblock situations where the inventors are hampered in their commercialisation ambition.
Further, the IP provisions only foresee royalty-free access rights for inventors in those cases where the university or research institution does not provide support for exploitation. In this way, the provisions complement the valuable role of research-performing organisations with their knowledge valorisation services.
In addition, the 2023 EIC work programme includes the possibility for institutions to suspend the access rights of EIC inventors where these go against the institutional valorisation strategies.
Asked about the 2023 call; check it still appliesRead it on the EU portal ↗Answered 13 Nov 2024
Confirm the current call documents and submission conditions with the funding authority.
View on EU portal ↗Source: EU Funding & Tenders Portal · synced 2026-11-09
A free account keeps your shortlist and sends deadline reminders. The EUACC connector brings this call, its FAQs, past winners and similar calls into Claude or ChatGPT, so you can check fit and draft with sources.