Loading page...
Loading page...
This round is closed. Synced from the EU Funding & Tenders Portal on 9 November 2026.
Projects the EU funded under this call, with the organisation that led each one.
COBRASCircular On-site Building with Robotic Assembly Swarms
Led by University of Stuttgart · Germany · 2026 · Official record ↗
SCALARMulti-Scalar Robotic Construction for Autonomous On-Site Assembly of Modular Timber Structures
Led by University of Stuttgart · Germany · 2026 · Official record ↗
BRICKSBRICKS: Building Robotic Intelligence and Modular Construction Kit System
Led by Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia · Italy · 2026 · Official record ↗
HARPAHeterogeneous Aerial Robot Teams for in-situ Prefabricated Building Assembly
Led by Technische Universiteit Delft · Netherlands · 2026 · Official record ↗
SITEBOTSwarm robotic Intelligence for TimbEr Building On-site Technologies
Led by Fundacion Tecnalia Research & Innovation · Spain · 2026 · Official record ↗
SWIFT-BUILDSwarm-based Inverted Fabrication for Timber Buildings
Led by University of Bristol · United Kingdom · 2026 · Official record ↗
PTAHPlaTform for Autonomous Robotic Housing
Led by The University of Sheffield · United Kingdom · 2026 · Official record ↗
ROBOTOMYROBOtic stereoTOMY
Led by Politecnico di Bari · Italy · 2026 · Official record ↗
Bio2PEsDevelopment of Bio-based and biodegradable polyethylene and polyesters for food packaging and agricultural applications
Led by Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest · Ireland · 2025 · 2024 edition · Official record ↗
CELLAGRICELLULOSE-BASED MULCH FILMS WITH NATURE-INSPIRED WATER-MANAGEMENT STRUCTURES FOR AGRICULTURAL APPLICATIONS
Led by Fraunhofer Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Angewandten Forschung eV · Germany · 2025 · 2024 edition · Official record ↗
Based on recent winners of this scheme in other years.
SATISPHACTIONUpcycling PHAs to innovative materials for fully sustainable food packaging
HORIZON-EIC-2024-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-03 · 2025 · Official record ↗
BORNBiObased theRmal-resistaNt food packaging
HORIZON-EIC-2024-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-03 · 2025 · Official record ↗
ECOSYSTEMEmerging eco-active materials by sustainable tools from natural renewable residues
HORIZON-EIC-2024-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-03 · 2025 · Official record ↗
CELLAGRICELLULOSE-BASED MULCH FILMS WITH NATURE-INSPIRED WATER-MANAGEMENT STRUCTURES FOR AGRICULTURAL APPLICATIONS
HORIZON-EIC-2024-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-03 · 2025 · Official record ↗
Bio4PakBiodegradable Bio-based Bioactive Packaging Technology for Supporting Food Safety
HORIZON-EIC-2024-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-03 · 2025 · Official record ↗
Bio2PEsDevelopment of Bio-based and biodegradable polyethylene and polyesters for food packaging and agricultural applications
HORIZON-EIC-2024-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-03 · 2025 · Official record ↗
DiBaNLinking Intestinal Bacteria and Host Metabolism to Tackle Type 2 Diabetes with Novel Food
HORIZON-EIC-2023-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-03 · 2024 · Official record ↗
GLUCOTYPESGlucose variability patterns for precision nutrition in diabetes
HORIZON-EIC-2023-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-03 · 2024 · Official record ↗
Each one links to its EU funding record and the partners it works with: a starting list for building a consortium.
Background and scope
Robotic automation offers significant advantages to several sectors, yet on-site construction robotics is amongst the most challenging and least understood fields in robotics. The unstructured, dynamic environment with human presence makes navigation and automation of the many concurrent construction tasks deeply challenging. Further, the current state-of-the-art solutions focus on adding higher degrees of automation to legacy tools, such as heavy equipment designed for diesel engines and human operators.
Radical innovations are essential for the sector to address the unprecedented wave of building growth, especially in the context of labour shortages, a productivity gap between the construction and other industries, rising expectations for occupational health and safety, and the need for healthier and more affordable living environments.
Through the collaboration of multiple agents (both humans and machines) construction processes can be accelerated, enabling more complex processes with multiple tasks to be performed simultaneously and collaboratively. Multi-robotic collaboration, where robotic agents support and complement each other’s tasks and skill sets within the same workspace, may unlock entirely new processes that are not possible using single robotic machines. This approach could involve multiple distributed “swarms” of collaborative robots using distributed control algorithms and robot learning systems, which may be better suited to large, spatially distributed tasks and can adapt to unpredictable environments. Doing so while also supporting the electrification of the (legacy suite of) construction equipment, will help break with the need to go for ever larger machines and facilitate the development of novel technologies that enable efficient accurate and reliable control, and the adoption of collaborative robots that are suitable for commercial on-site construction environments.
Realising the disruptive potential of novel emerging technology paradigms that reconsider construction processes from the fundamentals can help supplant and substitute the legacy suite of tools with novel autonomous collaborative construction robots in an integrated, “designed-for-robotics” digital production and assembly chain.
Such developments could also further enhance an emerging paradigm shift from today’s complex mix of on-site construction tasks, towards a future of off-site fabrication and on-site assembly. Off-site fabrication offers industrial economic advantages of producing modularized building elements at scale in a controlled, digitalized and automated factory environment. For the construction sector this paradigm shift can deliver demand-side emissions reductions, by implementing strategies of digitalized structural efficiency and novel materials, as well as of zeroemission construction sites through electrification.
This Pathfinder Challenge aims to address all construction tasks typically required for site preparation, substructure, and superstructure, as well as the coordination between 43 these tasks to support a transition towards building with autonomous electrified construction equipment. It includes the role of human agents in construction processes, as even high degrees of multi-robotic autonomy with low degrees of supervision will require a collaborative connection between human and robotic agents, ensuring they can safely collaborate and share the same workspace.
Specific objectives
The overall objective of this Challenge is the development of breakthrough technologies in the domain of autonomous collaborative on-site construction robots for an integrated, designed-for-robotics, digital production and assembly chain.
The Challenge is open to the 3 main construction tasks applied to the 2 main construction segments of buildings and infrastructure. Innovative application in adjacent construction segments (for example coastal protection foundations for energy infrastructure) also fall within scope.
Each funded project shall deliver the following 3 specific objectives:
Objective 1:
Development of a simplified structural, load-bearing, material-robot building system to assemble a representative and future-relevant structure (pavilion) using a multitude of discrete modules (elements, segments, blocks, voussoirs). This system must demonstrate TRL4 (validation in laboratory environment) of the autonomous collaborative multirobotic assembly. The structure can represent an infrastructure (for example a bridge, tunnel, culvert, conduit), a building (for example a tower, vault, dome, arch, multi-story skeleton, wall) or other construction elements (for example a foundation, secant wall, barrier, sea wall). The building system can also integrate unprocessed and pre-processed in-situ building materials (rocks, sand, natural materials, demolition materials, disassembled elements). Projects are expected to demonstrate the technologies at least at a relevant human scale in terms of volume, mass and moment of inertia, and ideally at a larger real-world architectural scale, rather than at a laboratory desktop scale.
Solutions are expected to incorporate “design-for-robotic-assembly” aspects, such as the robot-material interfaces, module interfaces and connectors, and may include innovative approaches such as embedded sensing in the modules.
A virtual simulation of the disassembled state, various intermediate assembly stages (including temporary (robotic) support measures if necessary) and final assembled state is expected to be part of the systems development process. The project should include a documented validation of key design decisions (for example materials used 44 or configurations that simulate scaled behaviour) against the minimal requirements of the TRL4 demonstration objectives of the autonomous mobile multi-robotic collaborative platform.
Objective 2:
Development of an autonomous mobile multi-robotic collaborative platform using at least two, preferably more, mutually aware collaborative robotic systems specifically designed for the assembly tasks outlined in Objective 1. This objective requires a structured systems engineering approach to conduct a thorough functional system analysis and to allocate system-level functions between humans and machines within the target autonomous mobile multi-robotic collaborative platform.
The design should include the definition of system states and modes, along with the transitions between them, to ensure safe autonomous operations and effective demonstration of robot-robot and human-robot collaborations and interactions (passive, active, adaptive) at TRL4.
The project should also describe how the proposed technology can be scaled to meet the full dimensions of the intended commercial application in future.
Utilizing existing industrial robots or modifying suitable existing construction tools is allowed. However, these approaches may face workspace limitations when scaled to full commercial dimensions. Conversely, novel relative multi-robotic platforms could make full use of the opportunities of the material-robot system independent of scaling limitations in future.
Objective 3:
Achieve a TRL4 demonstration of an autonomous assembly sequence using the demonstration building system developed in Objective 1, executed by the autonomous mobile multi-robotic collaborative platform developed in Objective 2. The demonstration of a subsequent disassembly sequence is optional but encouraged if the building system is designed for disassembly. The demonstration will take place in a laboratory environment, including tests that explore the system’s resilience and limits under controlled unstructured real-world conditions (for example fault tolerance, granular uneven surfaces, environmental obstacles). These tests aim to identify key weaknesses and recommend future technology developments.
The specific objective of this challenge is to advance the digitalized chain of off-site modular production with on-site autonomous mobile multi-robotic collaborative assembly. Therefore, on-site 3D-printing of cementitious materials or polymers as a primary construction task is outside the scope of this challenge.
Expected Outcomes and Impacts:
This Challenge contributes to the European Green Deal, the European AI Strategy, and the key strategic orientations of Horizon Europe for the digital and green transitions of the construction sector. The anticipated impacts of this Challenge include addressing likely shortages and competition in the labour markets, enhancing productivity and competitiveness within the construction industry, and improving worker safety. It will facilitate a shift towards offsite industrial fabrication coupled with onsite assembly and disassembly, reducing emissions from on-site construction activities, and lowering costs and mitigating risks associated with construction projects. This Challenge will also serve as a lighthouse for industrialization in important policy areas, such as affordable housing, the renovation wave, circular construction, and infrastructure development.
The field of mobile construction robotics, in particular heterogeneous collaborative robots assembling discrete building elements, is challenging and multi-disciplinary. Given the nascent state of the enabling technologies, the cumulative impact of the portfolio of Pathfinder projects is expected to surpass that of individual projects. Consortia will benefit from mutual learning and the exchange of approaches and expertise in areas such as mapping, navigating and building awareness of unstructured environments, force-aware manipulation, swarm collectives, as well as commercialisation pathways.
Furthermore, consortia will be encouraged to collaborate on developing performance metrics and communicate their outputs to the broader public with a view to accelerating the adoption of these radical innovations by the sector. Such valuable joint portfolio activities are anticipated to be discussed and agreed upon by the funded projects.
The portfolio of projects selected will aim to cover a complementary set of projects that span the “application” and “approach” fields specified below and combinations thereof:
- Applications fields (super-structure, sub-structure, site-preparation, building, infrastructure, other construction, target type of environment).
- Approach (type of robot, number of agents, coordination strategy, level of autonomy, strategy for stability during assembly sequence, multi-modal sensors, resilience strategy for environmental variability, type of discrete building elements and fixations, level of integration of material-robot system).
Applications for this Challenge with elements that concern the evolution of European communication networks (5G, post-5G and other technologies linked to the evolution of European communication networks) will be subject to restriction for the protection of European communication networks (see Annex II – Section B1)
1. Admissibility and eligibility conditions:
In order to apply, your proposal must meet the general eligibility requirements (see Annex 2) as well as specific eligibility requirements for the Challenge (please see TOPIC DESCRIPTION above).
Please check for particular elements (e.g., specific application focus or technology) in the respective Challenge chapter.
The EIC Pathfinder Challenges support collaborative or individual research and innovation from consortia or from single legal entities established in a Member State or an Associated Country (unless stated otherwise in the specific Challenge chapter). In case of a consortium your proposal must be submitted by the coordinator on behalf of the consortium. Consortia of two entities must be comprised of independent legal entities from two different Member States or Associated Countries. Consortia of three or more entities must include as beneficiaries at least three legal entities, independent from each other and each established in a different country as follows:
The legal entities may for example be universities, research organisations, SMEs, start-ups, natural persons. In the case of single beneficiary projects, mid-caps and larger companies will not be permitted.
Applications with elements that concern the evolution of European communication networks (5G, post-5G and other technologies linked to the evolution of European communication networks) will be subject to restriction for the protection of European communication networks (see Annex II – Section B1).
The standard admissibility and eligibility conditions and the eligibility of applicants from third countries are detailed in Annex 2.
Proposal page limit and layout:
Described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System.
Sections 1 to 3 of the part B of your proposal, corresponding respectively to the evaluation criteria Excellence, Impact, and Quality and Efficiency of the Implementation, must consist of a maximum of 30 format A4 pages. Excess pages will be automatically made invisible, and will not be taken into consideration by the evaluators. Please also consult Annex 2 of the EIC Work Programme 2025.
2. Eligible Countries
Described in Annex 2 of the EIC Work Programme 2025.
3. Other Eligible Conditions
Described in the EIC Work Programme 2025.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion
Described in Annex 2 of the EIC Work Programme 2025.
5a. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds
Described in section II of the EIC Work Programme 2025.
5b. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes
Described in section II of the EIC Work Programme 2025 and the Online Manual.
5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement
Described in section II of the EIC Work Programme 2025.
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants
Please refer to the Lump Sum Model Grant Agreement (Lump Sum MGA) used for Lump Sum EIC actions under Horizon Europe.
7. Specific conditions
Described in the EIC Work Programme 2025.
Call documents:
EIC Work Programme 2025
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Standard application form (HE EIC Pathfinder Challenges)
Standard evaluation form (HE EIC Pathfinder Challenges)
Challenge Guide
Model Grant Agreements (MGA)
Lump Sum MGA
Call-specific instructions
Detailed budget table (HE LS) 
Information on financial support to third parties (HE) 
Information on clinical studies (HE) 
Guidance: "Lump sums - what do I need to know?"
Additional documents:
HE Programme Guide
HE Framework Programme 2021/695 
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764 
EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment 
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement 
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual 
Funding & Tenders Portal Terms and Conditions 
Funding & Tenders Portal Privacy Statement
Applicants asked the EU 4 questions about this call and the EU published the answers. They clarify the call documents but do not replace them.
The inventor rights are only for those individuals that are explicitly appear as an inventor in a publication or patent filing. This does not include authors of scientific publication, where the authorship role does not include inventorship.
Asked about the 2023 call; check it still appliesRead it on the EU portal ↗Answered 16 Feb 2023
This criterion is applied by calculating how many Member States (MS) and Associated Countries (AC) are represented in the consortium. Consortia with a larger number of MS and AC represented get priority. Associated partners not requesting funding are not taken into account. Countries with several entities are only counted once. Example:
Consortium A has priority over consortium B.
Asked about the 2023 call; check it still appliesRead it on the EU portal ↗Answered 16 Feb 2023
Applicants must include information about the gender of their work package leaders in the application form (part B, table 3.1a – list of work packages). This information will be used to calculate the gender balance criterion. Proposals with a more balanced composition in terms of gender of work package leaders get priority.Work packages for which the gender of the work package leader is not clearly indicated will be counted as contributing to the gender which is already mostly represented. Work package leaders which are leading more than one work package will be counted only once. Proposals where the information on the gender of work package leaders is entirely missing will be counted as 100% imbalanced.
Asked about the 2023 call; check it still appliesRead it on the EU portal ↗Answered 16 Feb 2023
The EIC has a goal to stimulate innovation and the specific provisions on IP are for this purpose.
The underlying intention of the EIC IP provisions is not to take over the valuable activities of the TTOs/KTOs in Europe, but to empower the innovators to commercialise their inventions where the TTO/KTO support is not sufficient. The quality of this support is not equally available in all parts of Europe and we would like to unblock situations where the inventors are hampered in their commercialisation ambition.
Further, the IP provisions only foresee royalty-free access rights for inventors in those cases where the university or research institution does not provide support for exploitation. In this way, the provisions complement the valuable role of research-performing organisations with their knowledge valorisation services.
In addition, the 2023 EIC work programme includes the possibility for institutions to suspend the access rights of EIC inventors where these go against the institutional valorisation strategies.
Asked about the 2023 call; check it still appliesRead it on the EU portal ↗Answered 13 Nov 2024
Confirm the current call documents and submission conditions with the funding authority.
View on EU portal ↗Source: EU Funding & Tenders Portal · synced 2026-11-09
A free account keeps your shortlist and sends deadline reminders. The EUACC connector brings this call, its FAQs, past winners and similar calls into Claude or ChatGPT, so you can check fit and draft with sources.