Loading page...
Loading page...
This round is closed. Synced from the EU Funding & Tenders Portal on 9 November 2026.
Based on projects the EU funded on the same subject in this programme.
POC4TRIAGEPoint-of-Care Devices for Urgent Care Triage
HORIZON-HLTH-2023-TOOL-05-05 · 2024 · Official record ↗
STRONG-URSTRategies for Optimised bioprinting of Next Generation tissues for URethral regeneration and translation (STRONG-UR)
HORIZON-HLTH-2024-TOOL-11-02 · 2024 · Official record ↗
ENTRUSTENsuring Secure and Safe CMD Design with Zero TRUST Principles
HORIZON-HLTH-2022-IND-13-01 · 2023 · Official record ↗
m2MA bioprinting platform for the rapid, reliable, controlled and quantifiable patterning of cellular aggregates and microtissues into macroscale regenerative grafts with programmable architectures
HORIZON-HLTH-2024-TOOL-11-02 · 2024 · Official record ↗
CYLCOMEDCyber securitY tooLbox for COnnected MEdical Devices
HORIZON-HLTH-2022-IND-13-01 · 2022 · Official record ↗
SEPTONSECURITY PROTECTION TOOLS FOR NETWORKED MEDICAL DEVICES
HORIZON-HLTH-2022-IND-13-01 · 2022 · Official record ↗
CYMEDSECEnhanced cybersecurity for networked medical devices through optimisation of guidelines, standards, risk management and security by design
HORIZON-HLTH-2022-IND-13-01 · 2023 · Official record ↗
BioFACTORyFully automated cell and tissue-engineered bioimplant production for orocraniofacial regeneration
HORIZON-HLTH-2025-01-IND-01 · 2026 · Official record ↗
Each one links to its EU funding record and the partners it works with: a starting list for building a consortium.
This topic aims at supporting activities that are enabling or contributing to one or several expected impacts of destination “Developing and using new tools, technologies and digital solutions for a healthy society”. To that end, proposals under this topic should aim to deliver results that are directed at, tailored towards and contributing to all the following expected outcomes:
This topic aims to coordinate and develop the new European Research Area (ERA) policy action to accelerate, through an aligned and coordinated approach across Member States and Associated Countries, the development, validation/qualification, acceptance, and uptake of NAMs in biomedical research and regulatory testing of medicinal products and medical devices as part of the ERA Policy Agenda 2025-2027[2].
The ERA action should establish an EU-wide forum that brings together relevant ministries, regulatory agencies, research funding organisations, academia, industry (pharmaceutical and medical technology), Contract Research Organisations (CROs), small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)[3], and startups to harmonise policies and strategies for NAMs development and implementation.
The selected proposal should be coordinated by any active participant to the ERA action to ensure consistency with ERA action policy objectives. It should contribute to the implementation of the following themes of the four thematic Working Groups (WGs) of the ERA action:
WG1: Development of NAMs and common European infrastructures. This WG identifies opportunities for the development and integration of NAMs and the establishment of supporting infrastructures. Its focus spans specific disease or biological areas and safety, quality, and efficacy assessment endpoints for medicinal products and medical devices. The WG provides insight and suggests priorities to governments and industry for the further coordinated efforts to leverage promising development of NAMs, taking into consideration the complementarity of scientific strengths, funding priorities and available expertise in the different Member States and regions.
WG2: Validation, acceptance, and uptake of NAMs. The WG defines optimal criteria for NAMs to facilitate their uptake in the contexts of basic and applied biomedical research, and their acceptance for the regulatory assessment and eventual approval of medicinal products and medical devices within defined contexts of use. It proposes priorities for the validation and qualification of NAMs. Member States and pharma/MedTech industry take the decision to jointly support the validation/qualification of certain NAMs that are sufficiently mature for acceptance and uptake in regulatory testing of medicinal products and medical devices.
WG3: Education and training. The WG maps existing education and training programmes on NAMs and the 3Rs principles and assesses their quality and outreach. The WG makes suggestions to Member States based on the best practices identified for the joint development of high-quality education and training modules on NAMs and the application of the 3Rs principles in close partnership with education directors at knowledge institutes.
WG4: Openness and awareness. The WG develops common policies to improve the openness and quality of research, including open access to available protocols on NAMs, and facilitating the publication of results from NAMs and animal experiments, even if these are negative or neutral (or historic, if feasible and appropriate), to avoid unnecessary duplication of animal testing or development of non-valid NAMs. It considers strategies for sharing best practices to make sure that different ethical committees, funding assessment committees, reviewers, and regulators have a similar level of awareness regarding the latest scientific advancements in available NAMs. It proposes actions to enhance the confidence of regulators in validated and qualified NAMs. The WG also identifies opportunities for raising awareness among civil society and patients regarding the biomedical research, drug discovery and development process.
The European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) may contribute to the proposal selected for funding, particularly with activities on innovative in vitro biotechnologies.
[1] Replacement, Reduction, Refinement: https://nc3rs.org.uk/who-we-are/3rs
[2] Proposal for a Council Recommendation on the European Research Area Policy Agenda 2025-2027: https://european-research-area.ec.europa.eu/documents/proposal-council-recommendation-european-research-area-policy-agenda-2025-2027
[3] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32003H0361
1. Admissibility Conditions, proposal page limit and layout
Admissibility conditions are described in Annex A and Annex E of the Horizon Europe Work Programme General Annexes.
Proposal page limits and layout are described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System.
2. Eligible Countries
Eligible countries are described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.
3. Other Eligibility Conditions
In recognition of the opening of the US National Institutes of Health’s programmes to European researchers, legal entities established in the United States of America may exceptionally participate as a beneficiary or affiliated entity, and are eligible to receive Union funding.
Coordinators of projects must be legal entities established in an EU Member State or Associated Country.
If projects use satellite-based earth observation, positioning, navigation and/or related timing data and services, beneficiaries must make use of Copernicus and/or Galileo/EGNOS (other data and services may additionally be used).
The Joint Research Centre (JRC) may participate as member of the consortium selected for funding as a beneficiary with zero funding, or as an associated partner. The JRC will not participate in the preparation and submission of the proposal - see General Annex B.
Other eligibility conditions are described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion
Financial and operational capacity and exclusion are described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5a. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds
Award criteria, scoring and thresholds are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5b. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes
The thresholds for each criterion will be 4 (Excellence), 4 (Impact) and 4 (Implementation). The cumulative threshold will be 12.
Submission and evaluation processes are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual.
5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement
Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes.
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants
Eligible costs will take the form of a lump sum as defined in the Decision of 7 July 2021 authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – and in actions under the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2021-2025) [[This decision is available on the Funding and Tenders Portal, in the reference documents section for Horizon Europe, under ‘Simplified costs decisions’ or through this link: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/ls-decision_he_en.pdf]].
Legal and financial set-up of the grants are described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes.
Specific conditions are described in the specific topic of the Work Programme.
Application and evaluation forms and additional documents:
Application and evaluation form templates
Standard application form (HE CSA) - the application form specific to this call is available in the Submission System
Standard evaluation form (HE CSA) - will be used with the necessary adaptations
Guidance
HE Programme Guide
Model Grant Agreement (MGA)
Lump Sum MGA
Call-specific instructions 
Detailed budget table (HE LS) 
Guidance: "Lump sums - what do I need to know?"
Additional documents
HE Main Work Programme 2026-2027 – 1. General Introduction
HE Main Work Programme 2026-2027 – 4. Health
HE Main Work Programme 2026-2027 – 15. General Annexes
HE Programme Guide
HE Framework Programme 2021/695
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764
EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509
Decision authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual
Funding & Tenders Portal Terms and Conditions
Funding & Tenders Portal Privacy Statement
Applicants asked the EU 1 questions about this call and the EU published the answers. They clarify the call documents but do not replace them.
Yes, this is a Lump Sum topic, as stipulated in the specific conditions of the topic. To define and justify the Lump Sum, you need to provide a detailed budget table with cost estimations (downloadable as an Excel file form the online submission system). The estimations must be an approximation of your actual costs and meet the eligibility criteria of Horizon Europe.
In order to facilitate the evaluation of your proposal, you are encouraged to use the comments part of the detailed budget table and provide any details / explanations that are needed to better understand the specificities of your proposal. You are also advised to systematically justify any deviations in personnel costs.
Moreover, if your lump sum budget contains any cost items in cost category C and/or D, please make sure to justify these items in the comments part of the detailed budget table, as the proposal template has been simplified by removing this information from Part B and bringing it closer to the relevant budget items. Specifically, you must include justifications in the comments part of the detailed budget table if you are in any of the following situations:
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 6 Nov 2026
Confirm the current call documents and submission conditions with the funding authority.
View on EU portal ↗Source: EU Funding & Tenders Portal · synced 2026-11-09
A free account keeps your shortlist and sends deadline reminders. The EUACC connector brings this call, its FAQs, past winners and similar calls into Claude or ChatGPT, so you can check fit and draft with sources.