Loading page...
Loading page...
This round is closed. The next round and similar open calls are listed below. Synced from the EU Funding & Tenders Portal on 9 November 2026.
This call is closed. These open or upcoming calls fund the closest work.
Projects the EU funded under this call, with the organisation that led each one.
REGENSOILLRegenerating Brownfield Soils through Transdisciplinary Living Labs and Nature-Based Solutions
Led by Aston University · United Kingdom · 2026 · Official record ↗
Based on projects the EU funded on the same subject in this programme.
SOB4ESIntegrating SOil Biodiversity to Ecosystem Services: testing cost-effectiveness of Soil Biodiversity indicators and the provision of soil biodiversity-based Ecosystem Services to build better land management solutions that effectively implement the EU Soil Strategy
HORIZON-MISS-2022-SOIL-01-03 · 2023 · Official record ↗
ProPollSoilUnderstanding and managing soil health impacts to protect soil-dependent pollinators
HORIZON-MISS-2024-SOIL-01-05 · 2025 · Official record ↗
AI4SoilHealthAI4SoilHealth: Accelerating collection and use of soil health information using AI technology to support the Soil Deal for Europe and EU Soil Observatory
HORIZON-MISS-2021-SOIL-02-02 · 2023 · Official record ↗
InBestSoilMonetary valuation of soil ecosystem services and creation of initiatives to invest in soil health: setting a framework for the inclusion of soil health in business and in the policy making process
HORIZON-MISS-2021-SOIL-02-05 · 2023 · Official record ↗
HydroDataCube4EUSoil-hydrology data cube for EU: A soil-water-climate modeling platform to support mitigating flood, drought, wildfire events and help raise awareness of soil biodiversity's relevance
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-03 · 2026 · Official record ↗
CURIOSOILAwakening Soil Curiosity to catalyse Soil Literacy
HORIZON-MISS-2022-SOIL-01-07 · 2024 · Official record ↗
SOIL O-LIVETHE SOIL BIODIVERSITY AND FUNCTIONALITY OF MEDITERRANEAN OLIVE GROVES: A HOLISTIC ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF LAND MANAGEMENT ON OLIVE OIL QUALITY AND SAFETY
HORIZON-MISS-2021-SOIL-02-03 · 2023 · Official record ↗
SOILCRATESSOil Innovation Labs: Co-Regenerating And Transforming European Soils
HORIZON-MISS-2023-SOIL-01-08 · 2024 · Official record ↗
Each one links to its EU funding record and the partners it works with: a starting list for building a consortium.
Activities under this topic respond directly to the goal of the Mission ‘A Soil Deal for Europe' of setting up 100 living labs and lighthouses by 2027 to lead the transition to healthy soils by 2030. They support the specific objectives of the Mission Soil dealing with urgent soil health challenges (see in particular specific objectives 3, 4, 6 and 8 in the Mission implementation plan).
Activities should also contribute to meeting the European Green Deal ambitions and targets and more specifically those of the EU soil strategy for 2030 and the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030, the Zero Pollution Action Plan, the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe, the proposal for a Soil Monitoring and Resilience Directive, the Communication on Boosting Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing in the EU as well as to Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 15 on Life on land and SDG 3 on Good health and well-being.
Project results are expected to contribute to the following outcomes:
De-industrialisation and abandonment of areas previously developed for industrial or commercial purposes have produced many brownfields[1] all over Europe, representing a major concern at different levels with adverse effects on the economy the environment, human health, social well-being and quality of life in their surroundings. However, many brownfields are located within urban boundaries and as such represent an opportunity for sustainable urban regeneration initiatives and offer competitive alternatives to greenfield developments (in line with the New European Bauhaus initiative).
Projects under this topic are intended to expand and complement the network of Mission Soil living labs and lighthouses initiated with projects funded under Work Programmes 2023 and 2024 of the Mission Soil, with the aim of gradually establishing 100 living labs and lighthouses to lead the transition towards healthy soils by 2030.
The Mission ‘A Soil Deal for Europe’ proposes a novel approach to research and innovation in the area of soil health, including the implementation of living labs. Living labs have the potential to facilitate a green and fair transition by involving multiple actors in real-life sites within a local/regional setting to co-create soil health solutions and achieve large-scale impacts on soil health and soil governance.
Living labs are long-term collaborations between multiple actors to address common soil health challenges in real-life sites at local or regional level (10 to 20 sites in each living lab). Depending on the level at which each living lab operates and the specific context (e.g. land use covered or soil health challenge addressed), applicants can exceptionally propose living labs with fewer sites. Individual sites could be e.g. abandoned commercial and industrial sites, former mining areas or zones with former or current military activities. Sites that are exemplary in their performance in terms of soil health improvement and serve as places for demonstration of solutions, training and communication are lighthouses. Lighthouse sites can be part of a living lab or be situated outside a living lab.
Living labs can address soil health challenges in or across different land uses (agricultural, (peri-)urban, (post)-industrial, forest and (semi-)natural). Projects funded under this topic are expected to kick-start participatory process or build on existing ones. While normally projects run for four years, the duration of the projects should accommodate longer timescales required to establish participatory processes and/or for soils processes to take place. Actors working on common shared soil health challenges within and across the living labs of the same project, will be able to compare results, exchange good practices, validate methodologies, replicate actions and solutions and benefit from cross-fertilisation, thereby accelerating the transition towards the shared objective of improving soil health.
More specifically, the proposals should:
In line with the nature of living labs, projects must adopt the multi-actor approach. The actors involved in each living lab may vary based on its unique characteristics, and may include, among others, researchers, landowners or land managers, industry representatives (e.g. SMEs), public administrators and civil society (e.g. consumers, local residents, environmental NGOs, youth organisations). Care should be taken to describe the capabilities, roles and resources of the different actors involved in the living labs. An effective contribution of social sciences and humanities and the arts (SSHA) is expected to foster social innovation, knowledge transfer and socio-cultural and behavioural change.
To encourage and facilitate the involvement of different types of actors in the living labs, applicants are reminded of the different types of participation possible in a project under Horizon Europe. This includes not only beneficiaries (or their affiliated entities) but also associated partners, third parties giving in-kind contributions, subcontractors and recipients of financial support to third parties[3]. Financial support to third parties (FSTP) to facilitate active involvement of small actors (e.g. land managers, landowners, SMEs or civil society) in one or more of the living labs of a project, can be provided through calls or, if duly justified, without a call for proposals. Applicants are advised to consult the standard conditions set out in Annex B of the General Annexes including those that apply to FSTP.
Dedicated tasks and appropriate resources should be envisioned to collaborate with SOILL, the structure created to support soil health living labs and lighthouses which offers significant capacity building opportunities for the living labs actors. Applicants can benefit from the services of SOILL already during the proposal preparation stage. During implementation, collaboration will include, among others, regular reporting of living labs performance. The details of the collaboration will be further defined during the grant agreement preparation phase.
Proposals are expected to build on existing knowledge (e.g. data from national soil health monitoring, LUCAS) and solutions developed and tested at national scale or in the frame of other Horizon projects including those funded under the Mission ‘A Soil Deal for Europe’. Proposals should therefore include dedicated tasks and appropriate resources for collaboration with relevant projects and initiatives and engage in relevant Mission Soil clustering activities. Proposals are also encouraged to consider, where relevant, the data, expertise and services offered by European research infrastructures (ESFRI) and if relevant to cooperate with the Horizon Europe Partnerships on Agroecology and on Sustainable Food Systems and/or relevant networks active at local level, such as the EIP-AGRI operational groups to promote the involvement of key local stakeholders.
Proposals should demonstrate a route towards open access, longevity, sustainability and interoperability of knowledge and outputs through close collaboration with the EU Soil Observatory (EUSO) and the project SoilWise. In particular, proposals should ensure that relevant data, maps and information can potentially be available publicly through the EUSO maps and information can potentially be available publicly through the EUSO. Concrete efforts should be made to ensure that the data produced in the context of the funded project is FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Re-usable).
[1] According to the US Environmental Protection Agency, brownfields are properties that contain or may contain a hazardous substance, pollutant or contaminant, complicating efforts to expand, redevelop or reuse them.
[2] See the Mission implementation plan
[3] To explore the full range of options including what type of costs and activities are eligible to be funded under Horizon Europe, applicants should refer to the AGA – Annotated Model Grant Agreement https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/common/guidance/aga_en.pdf
1. Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layout
described in Annex A and Annex E of the Horizon Europe Work Programme General Annexes.
Proposal page limits and layout: described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System.
2. Eligible Countries
described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.
3. Other Eligible Conditions
Proposals must apply the multi-actor approach. See definition of the multi-actor approach in the introduction to this work programme part.
described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion
described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5a. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds
are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5b. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes
The overall threshold for the second stage evaluation will be 12, with a minimum threshold of 4 for the ‘Excellence’ criterion’.
are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual.
5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement
described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes.
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants
Beneficiaries may provide financial support to third parties to facilitate active involvement of smaller actors (e.g. land managers and owners such as farmers, SMEs or civil society) in one or more of the living labs of the project. The support to third parties can only be provided in the form of grants (further to calls or, if duly justified, without a call for proposals). The maximum amount to be granted to each third party is EUR 200 000.
described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes.
described in the [specific topic of the Work Programme]
Application and evaluation forms and model grant agreement (MGA):
Application form templates — the application form specific to this call is available in the Submission System
Standard application form (HE RIA, IA)
Evaluation form templates — will be used with the necessary adaptations 
Standard evaluation form (HE RIA, IA) 
Guidance
HE Programme Guide 
Model Grant Agreements (MGA)
HE MGA 
Call-specific instructions 
Information on financial support to third parties (HE) 
Additional documents:
HE Main Work Programme 2025 – 1. General Introduction
HE Main Work Programme 2025 – 12. Missions
HE Main Work Programme 2025 – 14. General Annexes
HE Programme Guide 
HE Framework Programme 2021/695 
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764 
EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment 
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement 
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual 
Funding & Tenders Portal Terms and Conditions 
Funding & Tenders Portal Privacy Statement
Applicants asked the EU 3 questions about this call and the EU published the answers. They clarify the call documents but do not replace them.
Applicants to topics HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-01 and HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-01-two-stage are allowed to use Financial Support to Third Parties (FSTP) as one of the options available under Horizon Europe (HE) to award grants to encourage and facilitate the active involvement of smaller actors (e.g., land managers and landowners such as farmers, SMEs or civil society actors) in the activities carried out in one or more of the proposed living labs of the project. The FSTP should not be used to fund actors or activities outside of the proposed LLs, nor to establish other LLs in other regions or countries. Similarly, the FSTP should not be used to fund isolated activities (e.g. fostering dialogue among actors) unrelated to the co-creation, testing and co-implementation of soil health solutions in the proposed LLs. Rather, it can be used to add new sites to the LLs of the project. The awarded FSTP grants must benefit the final recipients who are expected to be actively engaged in the activities of one of the LLs of the project with their contributions (including knowledge and expertise) or their field sites. Their activities should be fully aligned with the overarching objectives of the project. The FSTP should not be used to bring third parties that are responsible for implementing specific project tasks beyond the core activities of the beneficiaries (subcontracting) or that make available some non-monetary resources (goods, services or personnel) to a beneficiary to support the project implementation (in-kind contributions). The FSTP does not involve public procurement.
It is up to the consortium to decide whether to use or not FSTP. This decision has to be carefully taken considering also the time it implies to set the FSTP procedures. Since the FSTP grants are intended to support key aspects of the activities in the LLs (e.g. number of sites where soil health solutions are tested, participatory approaches) their implementation should begin early in the project timeline. The selection procedure and the criteria for providing FSTP, including the persons or category of persons that can receive the financial support, the number of recipients, the budget per recipient, the activities to be supported, the use of calls or not, will need to be detailed in the proposal (Part A, Part B and in the FSTP Annex).
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 15 Jun 2025
Financial Support to Third Parties (FSTP), also called cascading funding, can be used to attribute grants to certain third-party recipients, which are not partners in the consortium. The rules and conditions to use FSTP are described in the HE Model Grant AgreementPDF (Articles 6.2.D.1 and Article 9.4) and state that the consortium must ensure an objective and transparent selection procedure of third party recipients.
There is no limitation concerning the percentage of the total project’s budget that can be attributed to FSTP, provided that this amount is proportionate to and consistent with the contributions expected from the FSTP recipients.
One or more beneficiaries can implement the FSTP. The beneficiary(ies) implementing the FSTP will be responsible for the proper use of the funding by the FSTP recipients and must ensure the following conditions, as defined in Article 9.4 of the AGA: compliance with Article 12 HE AGA (Avoiding conflict of interest), Article 13 (Confidentiality and security obligations), Article 14 (Ethics), Article 17.2 (Give visibility to the EU funding), Article 18 (Respect specific rules for the action implementation), Article 19 (Information obligations) and Article 20 (Record-keeping). It should also be noted that the bodies mentioned in Article 25 (e.g., granting authority; ECA; OLAF) have the right to carry out checks, reviews, audits and investigations on the recipients, and in particular to audit the payments received.
The FSTP has to be included in the following parts of the proposal:
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 26 Jun 2025
Financial Support to Third Parties (FSTP) is usually awarded via a call for proposals. In topics HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-01 and HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-01-two-stage, FSTP can be awarded in exceptional cases and only when duly justified, without a call for proposals. This is the case when, for instance, applicants already have identified smaller actors (e.g. land managers and landowners such as farmers, SMEs or civil society actors), in the regions where their living labs will be deployed who are expected to be actively engaged in the activities of one of the LLs of the project with their contributions (including knowledge and expertise) or their field sites. In these cases, the FSTP without a call can be an advantage, reducing the time to engage those actors.
While the FSTP Annex to be submitted as part of the proposal refers to FSTP “in the form of a grant awarded after a call for proposals”, when awarding FSTP grants without a call, the same conditions apply. Therefore, the information to be provided and parameters to be established in the FSTP Annex by the applicants are:
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 26 Jun 2025
Confirm the current call documents and submission conditions with the funding authority.
View on EU portal ↗Source: EU Funding & Tenders Portal · synced 2026-11-09
A free account keeps your shortlist and sends deadline reminders. The EUACC connector brings this call, its FAQs, past winners and similar calls into Claude or ChatGPT, so you can check fit and draft with sources.