Loading page...
Loading page...
This round is closed. Synced from the EU Funding & Tenders Portal on 9 November 2026.
Themes & priorities:
Applicants are invited to select one or several of the following priorities:
Priority 1: Increasing risk awareness and preparedness of the population
Population plays an important role in disaster prevention and preparedness and citizens are usually the first responders to disasters. National, sub-national and local authorities should cooperate, together with the private sector and civil society organisations, to i) increase disaster risk awareness and understanding of the population, ii) foster a culture of risk prevention and preparedness to risks, iii) create favourable conditions for individuals to actively engage in disaster risk reduction/DRM activities, iv) communicate appropriately during emergencies, v) fighting disinformation and information manipulation in the DRM domain.
Evidence-based risk information and communication, as well as education activities, targeted to the public – including vulnerable groups and persons with disabilities– are effective tools to raise risk awareness, preparedness and contribute to response measures. A good understanding of everyone’s role in case of emergency will improve adherence to public warnings and instructions.
This priority correlates with the Union disaster resilience goal No. 2: ‘Prepare - Increasing risk awareness and preparedness of the population’.
Priority 2: Enhancing from early warning to early action
Early warning systems are key elements for disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation in view of the recent extreme weather events and cascading impacts across sectors. Taking into account climate scenarios, and other new risks, the importance of advanced multi-hazard and risk warnings has never been more widely acknowledged. Although in Europe there is considerable experience with early warning systems, especially for weather and climate-related hazards, recent disasters have shown that more effort and collaboration is necessary to bring the alert to the right decision level and up to the individual citizens. This call will support proposals that aim to strengthen the understanding between forecasting institutions and public authorities at various levels (national, regional, local) in order to enable a more rapid action through public warning mechanisms and arrangements, before or after a disaster strikes.
This priority correlates with the Union disaster resilience goal No. 3: ‘Alert - Enhancing early warning’.
Priority 3: Ensuring a robust civil protection system by strenghtening institutional capacity
Ensuring a robust civil protection system plays a crucial part in efficiently meeting the demands placed on civil protection and DRM authorities, in particular during and after a disaster, when society needs them most. Challenges related to emerging risks, increasing complexities during disasters, changing parameters as a result of climate change and the ever-growing risk of concurrent disasters or prolonged emergencies, require institutions with a role in DRM to adapt and prepare themselves accordingly.
Activities should focus on advancing preparedness, within and between organisations, sectors and borders, especially in the context of applying lessons identified in previous emergencies to existing structures and processes. A “whole of society” approach should be applied by further developing cooperation between public bodies, private sector, communities and other stakeholders. In addition, ‘preparedness by design’ should be embedded in across policies and investments. Proposals should also facilitate the transfer of knowledge or integration of science and innovation, including AI based tools, in the work of civil protection and other relevant authorities. In addition, this priority will focus on developing skills, expanding relevant knowledge, and improving capacity and performance of organisations or functional groups. As a result, the gained knowledge and experience should be applied nationally, bilaterally or internationally in a way that benefits the UCPM in the disaster risk prevention, preparedness or response activities.
Activities that can be funded
Under Priority 1 (Increasing risk awareness and preparedness of the population), this call for proposals co-finances activities that aim to enhance risk awareness, understanding and preparedness of the population, including through increasing the overall level of risk awareness, prevention and preparedness of individuals and communities , improving public access to disaster risk information, and enhancing the culture of risk prevention, self-protection, readiness and pro-active engagement of citizens. Proposals aiming to increase the availability of tools, trainings, and guidelines on raising citizens’ awareness on disaster risks, and on fighting disinformation and information manipulation in the DRM domain, are also eligible.
Under Priority 2 (Enhancing from early warning to early action), this call for proposals will co-finance activities that aim to adapt warning protocols to the operational needs of emergency responders and society at large, as well as proposals that strengthen public warning and alert systems. Proposals should also demonstrate that they build on previous efforts or that there is a clear and evidenced identified gap for the action. Joint capacity building activities of forecasting organisations, public administration, critical infrastructure managers, or other relevant organisations, are key to making early warning relevant and understandable for all. Proposals that promote the use of new technologies, such as Artificial Intelligence or Machine Learning, are also encouraged and the same applies for proposals that link up forecasting tools with wildfire behaviour analysis in order to serve national or regional operational needs.
Under Priority 3 (Ensuring a robust civil protection system by strengthening institutional capacity), this call for proposals will co-finance integrated projects that aim to strengthen the ability of institutions tasked with civil protection or DRM to effectively prepare for future disasters and to embed the preparedness-by-design principle across policies and investments. The focus of the activities should lie on expanding knowledge, skills, procedures, and tools in order to strengthen capacity at organisational level. Projects can focus on any or all of the following elements: gathering of knowledge and good practices from different DRM stakeholders, integrating input from science and research institutions into knowledge sharing activities relevant for DRM, elaboration of methodologies for skill and knowledge transfer. Activities may also focus on integrating lessons learnt from recent emergencies into capacity strengthening initiatives.
The Knowledge for Action in Prevention and Preparedness (KAPP) call for proposals aim to identify projects that contribute to strengthening the cooperation among UCPM countries and between the UCPM and third parties in preventing natural and human-induced disasters, as well as enhancing institutional preparedness and individual capacity initiatives. The KAPP calls' objective is to enhance the systemic relevance of the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) and support the implementation of the Union disaster resilience goals and the Preparedness Union Strategy.
KAPP Prevention and Preparedness call aims to identify projects that aim to contribute to strengthening the cooperation among the UCPM countries and between the UCPM and third countries for the prevention of natural and human-induced disasters, or to increase the preparedness of the UCPM and its stakeholders by providing funding for institutional preparedness and individual capacity strengthening initiatives.
While cross-border cooperation is relatively well-established in the area of emergency response, cross-border and multi-country cooperation during the prevention and preparedness phases can be further enhanced. Notwithstanding, the response phase could also benefit from streamlined communication protocols and interoperable systems that overcome language barriers in emergency situations.
Disasters know no borders. The ongoing and emerging risks posed by natural and human-induced hazards are cross-border due to their spatial dimension (e.g., earthquakes, fires, severe weather, floods and space weather), as well as the volatility and scale of their impacts (e.g., pandemics, impact of climate change on zoonotic diseases, nuclear/industrial accidents, marine pollution). The human, economic and environmental impacts triggered by these disasters, as well as their likelihood of occurrence exist irrespective of national borders. Emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence provide a novel opportunity to address these challenges in a more effective and efficient manner.
1. Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layout
described in section 5 of the call document.
Proposal page limits and layout: described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System.
2. Eligible Countries
described in section 6 of the call document.
3. Other Eligible Conditions
described in section 6 of the call document.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion
described in section 7 of the call document.
5a. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes
described section 8 of the call document and the Online Manual.
5b. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds
described in section 9 of the call document.
5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement
described in section 4 of the call document.
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants
described in section 10 of the call document.
Call document and annexes:
Call document
Application form templates
Standard application form (UCPM Prevention and Preparedness) — the application form specific to this call is available in the Submission System
Detailed budget table (UCPM)
Letter of support (UCPM)
Model Grant Agreements (MGA)
UCPM MGA
Additional documents:
UCPM Work Programmes
UCPM Decision 1313/2013
 
EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment 
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement 
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual 
Funding & Tenders Portal Terms and Conditions 
Funding & Tenders Portal Privacy Statement
Applicants asked the EU 29 questions about this call and the EU published the answers. They clarify the call documents but do not replace them.
The composition of the consortium can be changed through an amendment procedure after the signature of the grant agreement, respecting the grant agreement and the agreed contribution of the project.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 7 May 2026
Countries which are not part of the European Union do not need to follow EU public procurement rules as the EU Public Procurement Directive (2014/24/EU) is not applicable to them. On the other hand, ‘Contracting authorities’ receiving grants (as defined by the EU Public Procurement Directive), inside and outside the EU, must apply their national legislation on public procurement.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 7 May 2026
Subcontractors are physical or legal persons who have been selected to deliver a service following an appropriate public procurement procedure. The name of the subcontractors do not need to be included in the application form Part B, in order to avoid unnecessary amendments should there be a change in subcontracted personnel.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 7 May 2026
Subcontracting should normally constitute a limited part and must be performed by third parties (not by one of the beneficiaries/affiliated entities). Subcontracting going beyond 30% of the total eligible costs must be justified in the application. Subcontracting going beyond 30% of the total eligible costs must be justified in the application.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 7 May 2026
It should be presented by all participants which themselves are not the national authority or an international organisation (the status of international organisation should be clearly specified for the respective organisation). If there are several participants from the same country, and none of them is the national civil protection authority, only one letter is required.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 26 Apr 2026
The consortium must be composed, in all cases, of at least three legal entities from three eligible countries. Eligible countries are EU Member States, EU Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) Participating States, Instrument for Pre-Accession beneficiary countries not participating in the UCPM and the European Neighbourhood Policy countries mentioned in section 6 ‘Eligibility’ of the call document. The coordinator must be always from an EU Member States or UCPM Participating State. The decision of the countries to involve correspond to the applicants and it should be coherent with the scope and objectives of the proposed project.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 13 Apr 2026
An organisation registered in the United Kingdom or Switzerland cannot participate as a beneficiary or an affiliated entity, unless it is an international organisation. An organisation registered in the United Kingdom or Switzerland could be an associated partner, meaning that it could participate in the project without the right to receive a share of the grant.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 13 Apr 2026
Yes, international organisations are eligible. The rules on eligible countries do not apply to them. They do not count to the minimum of three entities from three different countries. Please pay attention to properly identify international organisations as such in the Part A. In addition, international organisations cannot act as lead consortium partner.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 13 Apr 2026
Section 6. ‘Eligibility’ of the call document (page 20) establishes that the consortium must include at least one civil protection or disaster risk management public administration organisation, as a beneficiary or associated partner. This organisation may be a national, regional or local authority (+30,000 inhabitants). So, as long as they fulfil these requirements, there are no further limitations.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 13 Apr 2026
Yes, a flat rate of 7 % for indirect costs is applicable by default (see Excel Detailed budget template) and should not be removed from the template.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 7 May 2026
Communication efforts of the projects are very much valued. Especially how the project engages and makes use of the Union Civil Protection Knowledge Network is very important as this contributes to ensure project objectives and results reach the broad civil protection community. Communication costs are in general eligible costs. As regards project websites related costs, the call is clear: “project websites: communication costs for presenting the project on the participants’ websites or social media accounts are eligible; costs for separate project websites are not eligible”. Concerning websites, we encourage you to use the project dedicated space on the Knowledge Network platform. Every project will own their own page where they can upload content and write contributions. We also invite you to use your own organisational websites to promote your project. Costs associated to this communication work is fully eligible. Communication material should be reported under category C.3 – other goods works and services, while the staff time should be reported under category A - unless subcontracted (Category B).
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 7 May 2026
Please note that, indeed, the use of actual costs for personnel is possible. The use of average personnel costs (unit cost according to usual cost accounting practices) is only possible for entities that consistently calculate average rates for their staff, as indicated in the Annotated Grant Agreement.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 7 May 2026
Projects must budget with unit costs in the terms of the call document: average personnel costsPDF; SME owner/natural person; and travel, accommodation and subsistence costs (Annex 2aPDF).
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 13 Apr 2026
The eligibility of software license costs depends on both the cost and the specific use within the project:
• General software licenses are usually considered part of indirect costs and should be covered by the overhead.
• If the software is specifically needed or developed for the project, it can be classified as a direct cost.
Regarding classification and depreciation, it may vary according to national legislation. If the license is purchased along with equipment, it may be depreciated according to the same rules. Alternatively, it could be classified as "Other goods." If the cost exceeds a specific threshold, it may also be subject of depreciation.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 13 Apr 2026
In the case of the KAPP call, volunteers’ costs are not considered as personnel costs, and they are explicitly excluded from being eligible as unit costs. Therefore, volunteers’ costs relating to per diems for transportation and meals, should be allocated to travel and subsistence costs.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 13 Apr 2026
The Key Performance Indicators annex should be submitted with the proposal and, if the project is awarded, as a deliverable to be submitted in the last month of the project duration. Please consult pages 17 and 28 of the call document.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 7 May 2026
LEAR appointment is not a condition for the submission of a proposal, but it must be completed before the signature of the grant agreement.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 7 May 2026
The signatory of the letter of support must be, in all cases, by the competent national civil protection authority of each country participating in the consortium that will receive the EU grant, namely, beneficiaries and affiliated entities. The only cases when the letter of support is not needed is when the participant is a national civil protection authority itself or if it is an international organisation. It is neither needed for associated partners.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 13 Apr 2026
Previous proposals are not publicly available. However, previous funded projects are available in the Funding & Tenders Portal and in the UCPKN page.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 13 Apr 2026
The Union Civil Protection Knowledge Network platform (UCPKN) is the hub for prevention and preparedness activities under the EU Civil Protection Mechanism. It can be a very useful channel to increase the visibility of your project and a place to share good practice with others. We ask as a minimum requirement that all projects (including those funded under KAPP) use the project page as a communication tool. Depending on the project content, other functions being rolled out in the coming year may also be helpful to your project. This could include: discussion groups, thematic communities and the Knowledge Library. The UCPKN team will work with willing consortia to identify appropriate avenues of contribution. The Commission project officers will be available to answer project-specific questions about the platform once the project implementation phase begins.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 25 Apr 2026
In principle, the developments proposed in the question would be eligible. This reply does not prejudge the eligibility and admissibility of the entire proposal.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 14 Apr 2026
Activities that are not eligible for funding under the call are also not eligible for funding through subcontracting. Please see section 2.4 ‘Non-eligible activities’ of the call document. Section 10 of the call document includes the cost eligibility rules. Please note that subcontracting going beyond 30% of the total eligible costs must be justified in the application, as indicated in section 13 of the call document.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 13 Apr 2026
While the beneficiaries shall decide how to classify their deliverables, projects are expected to make the majority of their deliverables public. For deliverables classified as ‘sensitive’, executive summaries in English of those deliverables should be submitted separately, as a different deliverable.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 13 Apr 2026
Yes, one entity may be involved in more than one application, in principle. However, it is fundamental that you prioritise your needs before preparing and submitting a proposal, and make sure that it has the highest possible relevance, quality and impact, not only for the countries involved, but also for the UCPM.
Regarding the financial and operational capacity of the entity, please note that it must have stable and sufficient resources, as well as the know-how and qualifications to successfully implement the project(s). So, please assess your financial and operational capacity before you participate in several proposals.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 13 Apr 2026
For questions related to the call document (scope, priorities, eligibility, admissibility, etc.) the contact is ECHO-CP-P-P@ec.europa.eu or ECHO-CP-KAPP@ec.europa.eu. For technical questions related to the submission of the proposal (forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.) IT-Helpdesk.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 13 Apr 2026
The evaluation of the proposals is carried out by an evaluation committee including experts from DG ECHO and other relevant Commission services and agencies.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 13 Apr 2026
The grant agreement is the last step before a project starts. It is only required for awarded projects.
The general model grant agreementPDF and the annotated grant agreementPDF are available on the Funding and Tender opportunities portal. They provide detailed information about this document.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 20 Apr 2026
While EU funding programmes 2021-2027 share the same EU Annotated Grant Agreement, they may have specific rules and specificities. In terms of keeping records and supporting documents, for projects funded by DG ECHO/under the Union Civil Protection Mechanism, entities need to keep timesheets for employees involved in the project (please see the Model Grant Agreement: Article 20.1 (e)).
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 13 Apr 2026
No. The final report (known as Periodic Report) - with its two parts - technical and financial - will be submitted in the final reporting and payment phase, opened after the end of the project (deadline for submission of the final report is 60 days after the project closure). However, a Layman report summarising the work of the project for a general audience is required as a mandatory deliverable.
Read it on the EU portal ↗Answered 13 Apr 2026
Confirm the current call documents and submission conditions with the funding authority.
View on EU portal ↗Source: EU Funding & Tenders Portal · synced 2026-11-09
A free account keeps your shortlist and sends deadline reminders. The EUACC connector brings this call, its FAQs, past winners and similar calls into Claude or ChatGPT, so you can check fit and draft with sources.