On this page · 17 sections→
Overview
EIC Pathfinder Challenges är den tematiska, uppifrån-och-ned-styrda halvan av Europeiska innovationsrådets Pathfinder-program: i stället för att låta dig välja vilket ämne som helst (det är Pathfinder Open) utser Europeiska kommissionen varje år en handfull strategiska djupteknologiska frontområden och finansierar de djärvaste forskningskonsortierna som jagar dem. 2026 års upplaga omfattar tre Challenges — Avancerade material för miniatyriserade system för energiskörd, Bioteknik för ett hälsosamt åldrande och DeepRAP (djupt resonemang, abstraktion och planering mot tillförlitliga kognitiva AI-system). Bidragen uppgår till 4 miljoner euro med en finansieringsgrad på 100 % (EU täcker alla stödberättigande kostnader) och riktar sig till tidig forskning med hög risk — ungefär TRL 1–4, det vill säga allt från en grundläggande princip till ett proof-of-concept i labbmiljö. Potten är 96 miljoner euro för 2026, fördelad på ungefär 32 miljoner euro per Challenge, med en enda årlig deadline den 28 oktober 2026. Detta är tålmodigt kapital för radikala idéer, inte ett produktstöd.
Siffrorna är nyktra.
Is this for you?
- Any legal entity in an EU Member State or Associated Country — universities, research organisations, startups, SMEs, industrial partners
- Single applicants allowed (unlike Pathfinder Open)
- Two-partner consortia from two different Member States / Associated Countries
- Early-stage science at TRL 1–4 (technology readiness level — lab concept to validated prototype)
- Work that fits one of the three named 2026 Challenge topics
- Open-topic blue-sky research on your own theme → EIC Pathfinder Open (2026 call closed; 2027 dates not yet published)
- Startup with working tech (TRL 5+) wanting scale-up money → EIC Accelerator
- Maturing results from a finished Pathfinder or ERC project → EIC Transition
- Market-near collaborative R&D with industry partners → Horizon Europe cluster calls or Eurostars
Consortium maths: a single applicant just needs to sit in a Member State or Associated Country; a two-entity consortium needs two different such countries; from three entities up, at least one partner must be in an EU Member State.
Success rates — the honest picture
Roughly 1 in 17 applications gets funded. A sharp, evidence-backed proposal is what separates the funded from the rejected.
| Call year | Challenge topics | Eligible proposals | Projects funded | Success rate | Total funding | Average grant | Results announced |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6 | 436 | 44 | 10.1% | €167M | €3.8M | 3 April 2023 |
| 2023 | 5 | 368 | 43 | 11.7% | €159M | €3.7M | 14 March 2024 |
| 2024 | 5 | 401 | 31 | 7.7% | €116M | €3.73M | 27 March 2025 |
| 2025 | 4 | 647 | 30 | 4.6% | €118M | €3.93M | 1 April 2026 |
| 2026 (open) | 3 | Closes 28 October 2026 | TBD | — | €96M indicative budget | Up to €4M per grant | — |
All figures from official European Innovation Council announcements. The 2024 round attracted 415 proposals, of which 401 were eligible. Demand has risen sharply: the 2025 round's 647 eligible proposals pushed the success rate to a record-low 4.6%. There is no hard resubmission cap for Pathfinder Challenges — the EIC Work Programme 2026 applies its 'three unsuccessful submissions' lockout only to the EIC Accelerator (since 1 January 2024) and the STEP Scale Up scheme (from 1 January 2026). Pathfinder evaluators may, however, include explicit advice not to resubmit in the Evaluation Summary Report. The 2026 call (HORIZON-EIC-2026-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01) splits its €96M in approximately equal shares across three challenges; grants are 100%-funded lump sums, open to single legal entities (mid-caps and larger companies excluded as sole beneficiaries) or consortia spanning at least two Member States or Associated Countries.
Eligibility
- 1De flesta Challenges kräver ett konsortium av minst tre oberoende juridiska personer, var och en etablerad i ett annat land, med minst en baserad i en EU-medlemsstat eller ett land associerat till Horisont Europa.
- 2För vissa Challenges tillåter EIC en enskild sökande eller ett konsortium med två partner, så minimiregeln om tre är inte universell — den enskilda Challenge-guiden är avgörande.
- 3Behöriga sökande omfattar universitet, forskningsorganisationer, små och medelstora företag, start-ups och andra juridiska personer, och programmet uppmuntrar aktivt blandade team från akademi och industri.
- 4Finansierad forskning måste befinna sig på tidiga teknikmognadsnivåer (ungefär TRL 1–4), där en vetenskaplig princip förs framåt mot ett proof-of-concept i labbskala snarare än att en produkt mognas.
- 5Varje ansökan måste behandla ett av de tre Challenge-temana för 2026 och tjäna den Challengens uttalade portföljmål; ansökningar utanför de namngivna ämnena är inte stödberättigande.
- 6Ansökningar måste visa en övertygande långsiktig vision om en radikalt ny teknik och ett angreppssätt med hög risk och hög vinst för att över huvud taget komma i fråga.
Unlike most Horizon Europe calls, Pathfinder Challenges accept three shapes: a single legal entity established in a Member State or Associated Country; a two-partner consortium of independent entities from two different Member States or Associated Countries; or a standard consortium of three-plus independent entities (at least one in a Member State, plus two others in different Member States or Associated Countries). The Work Programme lists universities, research organisations, SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises), startups — even natural persons — as eligible. The trap: in single-beneficiary projects, mid-caps and larger companies are explicitly not permitted. Big firms must join a consortium.
The United Kingdom is associated to the entire Horizon Europe programme — its only carve-out (the EIC Fund equity component of the Accelerator) is irrelevant to Pathfinder, a pure grant. Switzerland's association agreement now produces legal effects: Swiss entities count as Associated Country beneficiaries for award procedures from the 2025 budget onwards, so they can coordinate or partner in the 2026 Challenges with full EU funding. Check the live List of Participating Countries on the Funding & Tenders Portal before submission, as positions can shift.
Funding is 100% of eligible costs as a Horizon Europe lump sum, and the amount is determined during the evaluation, based on what you propose. The EIC (European Innovation Council) considers up to €4m appropriate per project — larger requests need explicit justification. Total pot: €96m, split roughly equally across the three 2026 Challenges. Evaluators comment on significant over- or under-estimation of costs, and the Work Programme advises a dedicated portfolio-activities work package of at least 10 person-months. Skipping it signals you have not read the rules.
Proposals with elements touching the evolution of European communication networks (5G, post-5G and linked technologies) fall under the protection restriction in Annex 2, Section B1 of the Work Programme: entities assessed as high-risk suppliers of mobile network communication equipment — and any entities they own or control — cannot participate as beneficiaries, affiliated entities or associated partners. The assessment weighs ownership and governance (state control, government involvement), links to third-country governments and supply-chain cybersecurity practices.
During grant preparation the agency checks the coordinator's financial capacity whenever the requested grant is €500,000 or more — public bodies and international organisations are exempt. The check uses uploaded accounts (profit-and-loss, balance sheet, audit report) plus indicators such as dependency on EU funding and prior-year deficits. A weak result can trigger joint-and-several liability of affiliated entities, pre-financing paid in instalments, no pre-financing at all, a demand to replace the entity — or rejection of the entire proposal. Thinly capitalised startup coordinators should prepare evidence early.
Every application must include a completed ethics self-assessment; projects raising ethics issues undergo a full ethics review before funding is authorised, with resulting requirements written into the grant agreement as deliverables. Projects involving EU-classified or sensitive information go through a separate security appraisal — anything involving TRES SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET information cannot be funded at all. Relevant for the 2026 Challenges' biotech (healthy-ageing trials, human material) and cognitive-AI (trustworthy AI, dual-use) themes.
Where you need to be
Your project should sit at TRL 1–4 when you apply. The eligible band is highlighted below.
- 1Basic principles observedA scientific idea is first noted; research begins translating observations into possible applications.
- 2Technology concept formulatedA practical application is invented on paper, but nothing has been built or tested yet.
- 3Experimental proof of conceptLab experiments confirm the key idea actually works in principle.
- 4Technology validated in labComponents are built and shown to work together under controlled lab conditions.
- 5Technology validated in relevant environmentThe technology is tested in conditions that mimic the real world, not just the bench.
- 6Technology demonstrated in relevant environmentA working prototype is demonstrated in a realistic, industrially relevant setting.
- 7System prototype demonstration in operational environmentA near-final prototype is proven in the actual operating environment.
- 8System complete and qualifiedThe technology is finished, certified and qualified through testing.
- 9Actual system proven in operational environmentThe fully commercial product works reliably in real-world deployment.
The money — 100%-funded research grants, zero dilution
This is a Horizon Europe research grant at 100% of eligible costs with a 25% flat-rate top-up for indirect costs. There is no national matching budget to secure and no own-contribution requirement — a startup or university lab can run a €4M project without putting in cash.
Under the 2026 work programme, Pathfinder grants are paid as lump sums: you submit a detailed budget at proposal stage, the amount is fixed during grant preparation, and payment follows completed work packages instead of audited timesheets and cost statements. Simpler admin — but get the budget right up front, because it is locked at signature.
Challenges are the only Pathfinder route where one company or one lab can apply alone — but you are scored against multi-partner consortia, and the EIC's Programme Managers assemble each Challenge's winners as a deliberate portfolio of competing and complementary approaches. A €96M budget at ~€4M a grant means roughly 25–30 winners across all three topics.
How to apply — step by step
- 1Pick a Challenge and form your team6-10 weeks to scope and assemble
EIC (European Innovation Council) Pathfinder Challenges fund only predefined topics — for 2026 these are Advanced Materials for Miniaturised Energy Harvesting Systems, Biotechnology for Healthy Ageing, and DeepRAP (trustworthy cognitive AI). You read the specific Challenge Guide for your topic, then decide how to apply: unlike Pathfinder Open, Challenges do not require three partners from three countries — a single legal entity or a small consortium (two or more independent entities) can apply, and UK applicants are eligible. The science must sit at low maturity — Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 1 to 4, i.e. lab-stage breakthroughs, not products.
- 2Write and submit the full proposal (single stage)8-12 weeks to write
Unlike the EIC Accelerator, Pathfinder Challenges have no short-proposal or video stage — you submit one complete proposal (Part A administrative forms plus the Part B narrative covering Excellence, Impact and Implementation) through the EU Funding & Tenders Portal before the deadline (28 October 2026, 17:00 Brussels time, for the 2026 Challenges). The proposal must dedicate a work package to portfolio activities and allocate at least 10% of the budget to them, since funded projects are run as a managed portfolio. Requested grants are typically up to €4 million at 100% funding.
- 3Remote expert evaluation against three award criteria~3-5 months after the deadline
At least three independent external expert evaluators score the proposal remotely against Excellence, Impact, and Quality & Efficiency of Implementation, then reach a consensus with a single evaluation summary report. There is no jury interview for Pathfinder (that exists only in the Accelerator). Proposals must clear every criterion threshold to be ranked; ranked proposals compete for the fixed Challenge budget (€96 million across the three 2026 Challenges).
- 4Ranking, selection and grant agreement~3-5 months to signature
EIC ranks the above-threshold proposals and selects within budget; the Programme Manager for each Challenge shapes the resulting portfolio. Successful applicants are invited to grant-agreement preparation with the European Innovation Council and SMEs Executive Agency (EISMEA). Winners can also receive Booster grants of up to €50,000 for additional portfolio or take-up activities.
What evaluators look for
Excellence
The highest-weighted and highest-bar criterion. Evaluators want a credible long-term vision, a genuine science-to-technology breakthrough that goes well beyond the state of the art, a high-risk/high-gain research approach, and a plausible, well-founded methodology — assessed against the specific objectives of the chosen Challenge.
- Long-term vision and relevance to the Challenge objectives
- Novelty and ambition of the science-to-technology breakthrough
- High-risk/high-gain interdisciplinary research approach
- Plausibility of the methodology, concepts and assumptions
Impact
Evaluators look for transformative potential effects on economy, society and environment, the capacity to generate disruptive innovation and create new markets, and concrete measures to manage intellectual property and pull results toward future application.
- Significance of potential transformative positive effects
- Potential for disruptive innovation and new-market creation
- Measures to maximise expected outcomes (IP, dissemination, exploitation)
Quality and Efficiency of the Implementation
Evaluators assess whether the work plan, timeline, milestones and risk mitigation are coherent, resources and budget are appropriate (including the mandatory portfolio work package), and whether the consortium has the capacity and complementarity to deliver.
- Coherence and effectiveness of the work plan, milestones and risks
- Appropriateness of resources and budget allocation
- Capacity and complementarity of the participants / consortium
Documents you'll need
The legal rulebook for every European Innovation Council (EIC) call in 2026 — the Pathfinder Challenges section (pp. 30–46) is the text your proposal is evaluated against.
- Contains:
- Section II.2 ‘EIC Pathfinder Challenges’ (pp. 30–46): the €96 million call budget split roughly equally across three challenges, the ~€4 million indicative grant size, 100% funding rate as a lump sum, award criteria (Table 3, p. 34) and portfolio selection rules. The three 2026 challenge descriptions sit at pp. 37–46: Advanced Materials for Miniaturised Energy Harvesting Systems (p. 37), Biotechnology for Healthy Ageing (p. 39), DeepRAP — Deep Reasoning, Abstraction & Planning towards trustworthy Cognitive AI Systems (p. 43). General admissibility and eligibility conditions are in Annex 2 from p. 152.
- Length:
- Pathfinder Challenges: pp. 30–46 of 193; your challenge’s 2–4 pages within pp. 37–46; Annex 2 general conditions from p. 152
- Why:
- Evaluators score your proposal against the expected outcomes and award criteria written here — nowhere else. It also fixes the €50,000 Booster grant rules and the lump-sum legal basis.
- When:
- Read pp. 30–46 before you write a single word; re-check Annex 2 (pp. 152 onwards) before submission on 28 October 2026.
The official applicant guide for challenge topic HORIZON-EIC-2026-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-01 — scope, portfolio considerations and what the Programme Manager wants to see.
- Contains:
- The challenge’s overall goal and specific objectives, the categories used to map above-threshold proposals into a funded portfolio, scope boundaries (what is in and out), and practical guidance from the EIC Programme Manager. Last updated 28 October 2025.
- Length:
- 13 pages
- Why:
- Pathfinder Challenges are portfolio-selected: being above threshold is not enough. This guide defines the portfolio categories the Evaluation Committee uses to pick winners — the 2025 round funded only 7 of 56 above-threshold proposals on exactly this basis.
- When:
- Read alongside the Work Programme topic text before choosing your angle; align your objectives with its specific objectives explicitly.
The official applicant guide for challenge topic HORIZON-EIC-2026-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-02 — interventions that prevent, delay or reverse age-related decline.
- Contains:
- Goal and specific objectives for the Healthy Ageing challenge, portfolio considerations used at the final evaluation panel, scope clarifications and Programme Manager guidance. Last updated 28 October 2025.
- Length:
- 14 pages
- Why:
- Defines the portfolio categories that decide funding among above-threshold proposals — your proposal must visibly slot into one.
- When:
- Before writing; revisit when drafting your objectives and impact sections.
The official applicant guide for challenge topic HORIZON-EIC-2026-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-03 — next-generation cognitive AI beyond pattern-matching.
- Contains:
- Goal and specific objectives for the DeepRAP challenge, portfolio considerations, scope boundaries and Programme Manager guidance. Last updated 28 October 2025.
- Length:
- 13 pages
- Why:
- The portfolio mapping in this guide is the deciding filter after individual evaluation — proposals that score well but do not fit a portfolio category are rejected.
- When:
- Before writing; re-read when positioning your project against the challenge’s specific objectives.
The official submission entry point for call HORIZON-EIC-2026-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01 — open since 5 February 2026, closes 28 October 2026 at 17:00 Brussels time.
- Contains:
- All three topic pages (01-01, 01-02, 01-03), the submission system, and the call-specific document set (templates, conditions) — all available now as the call opened on 5 February 2026. Grant type: HORIZON Lump Sum Grant (HORIZON-AG-LS).
- Length:
- n/a (portal page)
- Why:
- This is where you actually submit — and where the final, call-specific versions of all templates appear at opening.
- When:
- Call is open now — call-specific documents are published on the portal. Submit before 28 October 2026, 17:00 Brussels time.
The EIC’s own hub for the 2026 Challenges: the three Challenge Guides, the Work Programme, and the 20 March 2026 Info Day recordings in one place.
- Contains:
- Links to all three Challenge Guides, the EIC Work Programme 2026 (amended version dated 17 June 2026, adding defence and dual-use technology provisions), and the per-challenge Info Day webcasts held 20 March 2026.
- Length:
- n/a (web page)
- Why:
- The single official page the EIC updates when anything about the 2026 Challenges changes — check it for corrigenda and new guidance.
- When:
- First stop when starting; recheck monthly until the deadline.
The official proposal template: Part A administrative forms plus the Part B technical description your consortium must follow section by section.
- Contains:
- The Horizon Europe standard application form for EIC Pathfinder Challenges (call-specific version generated 18 June 2026, published with the submission session on 22 July 2026): Part A (participants, budget, ethics) and the Part B template with the Excellence / Impact / Implementation structure, page limits and the lump-sum work-package logic.
- Length:
- 52 pages (template plus completed example)
- Why:
- Evaluators read your Part B against this exact structure; deviating from the headings or page limits risks losing points or admissibility.
- When:
- The call-specific version is now available on the portal — the submission session opened 22 July 2026. Open it the day you start drafting.
The mandatory Excel annex to Part B: cost estimates per beneficiary, per work package and per cost category, which become your fixed lump-sum shares.
- Contains:
- The Horizon Europe lump-sum detailed budget table: personnel, subcontracting, purchases and other costs per partner and per work package, auto-generating the lump-sum breakdown you copy into Part A. Pathfinder Challenges (unlike Pathfinder Open) require this annex because the grant is a lump sum.
- Length:
- n/a (spreadsheet)
- Why:
- Evaluators comment on this table in the Evaluation Summary Report, and the amounts you enter are fixed in the grant agreement — there is no actual-cost reporting later to correct mistakes.
- When:
- Build it in parallel with your work-package plan, not after. The call-specific version was published when the submission session opened on 22 July 2026 — use that one for submission.
The article-by-article commentary on the EU grant contract you will sign — the authority on what lump-sum beneficiaries may and may not do.
- Contains:
- Annotations for every article of the EU Model Grant Agreement, including the lump-sum variant (HORIZON-AG-LS): payment of lump-sum shares on work-package completion, reporting, amendments, checks and audits.
- Length:
- 431 pages — consult by article, never read cover to cover
- Why:
- When a consortium argues about IP, payments or partner changes, the answer is in here — and it binds the European Commission’s project officers too.
- When:
- Dip in during grant agreement preparation, not during proposal writing; consult specific articles as questions arise.
The Commission’s plain-language guide to writing and budgeting a lump-sum proposal — the funding model the 2026 Pathfinder Challenges use.
- Contains:
- How lump sums are set during evaluation from your detailed budget table, how work-package completion (not success) triggers payment, how to structure work packages across reporting periods, and common budgeting errors.
- Length:
- 42 pages
- Why:
- Lump-sum grants remove cost reporting but punish bad work-package design: a package not completed means its share is not paid. This explains how to design around that.
- When:
- Read before structuring your work plan and budget — it changes how you cut work packages.
The short companion guide on life after award: reporting, payments and amendments under a lump-sum grant agreement.
- Contains:
- Periodic reporting on work-package completion, what happens when a work package is only partly done, payment mechanics and amendment procedures for lump-sum grants.
- Length:
- 15 pages
- Why:
- Knowing how completion is assessed after award should shape how cautiously you scope work packages in the proposal.
- When:
- Skim during proposal design; read properly at grant agreement preparation.
The EIC’s own answers to the questions Pathfinder applicants ask most about the lump-sum budget table and financial annexes.
- Contains:
- Roughly four focused Q&As on the lump-sum budget table as part of the proposal, cost accounting practices, and pointers to the portal’s full lump-sum guidance.
- Length:
- n/a (web page)
- Why:
- Short, official and specific to EIC calls — faster than the 42-page guide for quick budget-table questions.
- When:
- While filling in the detailed budget table.
The EIC’s full FAQ collection across Pathfinder, Transition and Accelerator — eligibility, evaluation, resubmission and portal mechanics.
- Contains:
- Topic-organised FAQs covering eligibility, consortium composition, evaluation procedure, lump sums and submission practicalities, updated by the EIC as calls evolve.
- Length:
- n/a (web page)
- Why:
- The first official place to check before emailing the helpdesk — answers here carry the EIC’s authority.
- When:
- Whenever a procedural question comes up during drafting or submission.
The Funding & Tenders Portal’s central lump-sum page: all guidance, events, webinar recordings and the personnel-cost dashboard in one place.
- Contains:
- Links to the lump-sum guidance documents, ‘How does it work? How to write a proposal?’ webinar recordings, the personnel cost dashboard for benchmarking daily rates, and news on lump-sum policy.
- Length:
- n/a (web hub)
- Why:
- The personnel-cost dashboard helps you justify daily rates in the budget table; evaluators check plausibility against exactly this kind of benchmark.
- When:
- While budgeting; rewatch a webinar recording before finalising the financial annex.
The official Info Day for the three 2026 challenges, with Programme Managers presenting scope and answering applicant questions.
- Contains:
- Webcast sessions held 20 March 2026 (11:00–13:00 CET) for each challenge, with Programme Manager presentations on scope, portfolio logic and evaluation.
- Length:
- n/a (event page with webcast)
- Why:
- Programme Managers signal here what they want funded — nuance you will not find in the Work Programme text.
- When:
- Watch the session for your challenge before locking your project’s positioning.
Typical Budget Breakdown
2026 Deadlines
- 22 Jul 202622 Jul 2026Call opens
Planned opening on the EU Funding & Tenders Portal (HORIZON-EIC-2026-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01); the responsible Director-General may shift opening by up to one month either way.
- 28 Oct 2026, 17:00 Brussels28 Oct 2026, 17:00 BrusselsSingle submission deadline
One cut-off for all three Challenges. Part B sections 1–3 capped at 30 A4 pages; submit via the Funding & Tenders Portal. The deadline itself can be delayed by up to two months by the Director-General.
- Nov 2026 – Mar 2027Nov 2026 – Mar 2027Two-step evaluation
Step 1: at least three EIC expert evaluators score each proposal against Excellence (threshold 4/5), Impact (3.5/5) and Implementation (3/5). Step 2: an evaluation committee including EIC Programme Managers assembles the Challenge portfolio — above-threshold scores do not guarantee selection.
- By ~28 Mar 2027 (T+5 months)By ~28 Mar 2027 (T+5 months)Results letters and Evaluation Summary Report
Horizon Europe's indicative five-month time-to-inform. Retained applicants get a funding letter; portfolio-consideration reasoning is disclosed if you scored above a funded proposal but were not selected.
- Apr–Jun 2027Apr–Jun 2027Grant agreement preparation
Expected to complete within three months of the invitation letter. The EIC Project Officer and Programme Manager plan portfolio activities and start the Challenge roadmap with you during this phase; financial-capacity and legal-entity validation happen here.
- By ~28 Jun 2027 (T+8 months)By ~28 Jun 2027 (T+8 months)Grant agreement signature
Horizon Europe's indicative eight-month time-to-grant from the call deadline.
- ~30 days after signature / project start~30 days after signature / project startFirst pre-financing lands
Normally 160% of the average EU funding per reporting period (less for single-period actions), minus a 5–8% deduction routed to the Mutual Insurance Mechanism.
After you're funded
EIC Programme Managers define each Challenge and then build and steer the winners as a portfolio — competing approaches and complementary angles run side by side. Expect joint portfolio activities with the other funded teams in your Challenge, not a quiet bilateral grant.
Pathfinder winners get the same Business Acceleration Services machine as Accelerator companies: tailored coaching and mentoring, access to corporates, investors and ecosystem partners — useful early, since most Pathfinder teams are years from a product.
Running Pathfinder projects can apply for fixed-amount Booster grants of up to €50,000 to explore commercialisation routes for emerging results — small money, but non-competitive with your main budget.
Pathfinder is the start of the EIC pipeline: results feed eligibility for EIC Transition (lab-to-market maturation), and the EIC offers potential fast-track access to the EIC Accelerator for the most promising outcomes.
Winning the evaluation only earns you grant agreement preparation; funding is explicitly conditional on signature. Under the lump-sum model, instalments are then tied to completing work packages — slipping a work package delays the payment attached to it.
Practical notes
Unlike most Horizon Europe calls, Pathfinder Challenges accept either a single applicant or a consortium of at least three independent legal entities in different countries. In practice teams coalesce around the three challenge topics: each topic page on the Funding & Tenders portal (the European Commission's application site) has partner-search switched on, so you can browse announcements from labs and firms targeting the same topic, and the 20 March 2026 Info Day ran per-challenge networking sessions where attendees pitched their competences in two minutes to find co-applicants. The recordings and slides remain on the event page.
Every EU country — and many non-EU participants — runs a National Contact Point (NCP) network: government-funded advisers whose job is to help you apply to Horizon Europe at no charge. They explain eligibility, run information and networking events, and organise proposal-writing workshops. Ask your NCP early whether they offer a pre-submission read-through of your draft; offerings vary by country, and the directory on the Funding & Tenders portal lists the right adviser by country and thematic function.
The European Innovation Council (EIC) held its online Info Day for this call on 20 March 2026. The plenary covered how Pathfinder Challenge calls differ from the bottom-up Pathfinder Open, and parallel sessions were led by the EIC Programme Managers who wrote the three challenges — Paolo Bondavalli (advanced materials), Uschi Symmons (healthy ageing) and Hedi Karray (DeepRAP). Since Programme Managers actively steer their challenge portfolios after award, their recorded sessions and slides are required viewing before you draft.
Each of the three 2026 challenges has its own Challenge Guide PDF on the EIC challenge page, alongside the EIC Work Programme 2026 (which puts €262 million into Pathfinder overall this year). Challenge proposals are scored against the specific objectives and expected outcomes in these documents, not against a generic excellence template — projects that ignore the portfolio logic the Programme Manager describes tend to fail on impact. Grants run up to €4 million; the single deadline is 28 October 2026.
Who's been funded
Builds a standalone solar-powered device that turns waste nitrates and carbon dioxide into urea and other nitrogen chemicals for farming and pharma, using sunlight as the only energy source.
Uses sunlight to pull nitrogen from the air and convert it into fertiliser on the farm, cutting out the energy-hungry centralised ammonia plants the world currently depends on.
Replaces fossil-fired lime kilns with microwave heating so the carbon dioxide released during lime-making can be captured and reused rather than vented into the atmosphere.
Develops compostable food packaging from a natural biopolymer laced with bacteria-killing viruses (phages), so the wrapper itself helps keep food safe while replacing fossil-based plastic.
Combines electrical and optical brain-inspired chips so devices at the network edge can process data with a fraction of today's energy use.
Builds robotic tools and propulsion to harvest dead satellites in orbit and recycle them into structural parts and propellant, turning space junk from a hazard into a resource.
Key Features
Official links & resources
- Call page: EIC Pathfinder Challenges 2026 (HORIZON-EIC-2026-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01) — Funding & Tenders portal
- Topic: Advanced Materials for Miniaturised Energy Harvesting Systems — start your submission here
- Topic: Biotechnology for Healthy Ageing — start your submission here
- Topic: DeepRAP — Deep Reasoning, Abstraction & Planning towards trustworthy Cognitive AI Systems — start your submission here
- EIC Pathfinder Challenges 2026 — official challenge pages with downloadable Challenge Guides
- EIC Work Programme 2026 — full text (latest version, amended June 2026) plus factsheets and recorded info sessions
- EIC Pathfinder — programme overview (TRL 1-4, grants up to €4 million)
- Frequently asked questions on EIC Pathfinder — eligibility, consortium rules, budgets, resubmission
- 2026 Pathfinder Challenges Info Day (20 March 2026) — recordings, slides and agenda
Frequently Asked Questions
Challenges finansierar forskning inom fasta, uppifrån-och-ned-styrda ämnen som fastställts av Europeiska kommissionen (tre för 2026), medan Open låter dig föreslå vilket banbrytande tema du vill. Båda stöder forskning i tidigt skede med hög risk vid upp till 4 miljoner euro och en finansieringsgrad på 100 %.
Avancerade material för miniatyriserade system för energiskörd; Bioteknik för ett hälsosamt åldrande; och DeepRAP — djupt resonemang, abstraktion och planering mot tillförlitliga kognitiva AI-system.
Upp till 4 miljoner euro per projekt, med en finansieringsgrad på 100 %, vilket innebär att EU täcker alla stödberättigande kostnader och ingen medfinansiering krävs. Större belopp är möjliga endast där en specifik Challenge tillåter det och budgeten är väl motiverad.
Vanligtvis ja — de flesta Challenges kräver minst tre oberoende enheter etablerade i tre olika länder, med minst en i ett EU- eller associerat land. Vissa Challenges tillåter dock en enskild sökande eller ett konsortium med två partner, så kontrollera den enskilda Challenge-guiden.
I Challenges-omgången 2025 finansierade EIC 30 av 647 stödberättigande ansökningar — en framgångsgrad på ungefär 4,6 %. Observera att omgången 2025 spände över fyra olika Challenge-områden, så läs detta som en indikator på konkurrensläget snarare än en siffra för samma ämne. Utlysningen 2026 förväntas vara lika konkurrensutsatt, med 96 miljoner euro fördelade på tre teman.
Det finns en enda årlig deadline: den 28 oktober 2026 kl. 17.00 lokal tid i Bryssel, med ansökningar inlämnade via EU:s Funding & Tenders Portal. Det finns ingen löpande eller andra deadline.
Tidigt skede — ungefär TRL 1–4, från en grundläggande vetenskaplig princip till ett proof-of-concept i labbskala. Projekt närmare marknaden passar bättre i EIC Transition eller EIC Accelerator.
Related Programmes
Explore Further
Ask about EIC Pathfinder Challenges
Get instant AI answers about EIC Pathfinder Challenges — eligibility, deadlines, tips, and more.